Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

14-09-2020 19:10

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonsoir, Sur branche morte de Berberis vulgaris.

12-09-2020 22:44

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Bonsoir. Trouvé dans une pataugeoire à sanglier

13-09-2020 22:20

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonsoir, Sur tige morte décortiquée de Rosa sp.

14-09-2020 18:57

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonsoir à tous, Sur branche morte aérienne, en

14-09-2020 15:10

Joop van der Lee Joop van der Lee

Found on horse dung.Perithecia: 704x404 um, covere

12-09-2020 19:57

Thorben Hülsewig

Hi there,last week i found on ground this Ombrophi

11-09-2020 21:47

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello,I'm looking for any published records of Rut

12-09-2020 16:43

Juuso Äikäs

Yesterday I found a fruitbody of Tolypocladium cap

10-09-2020 12:18

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi againDoes anyone know what anamorphic state the

09-09-2020 17:28

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour, Sur branche morte de lierre (Hedera) cou

« < 431 432 433 434 435 > »
Acervus?
Fedorenko Vassiliy, 06-09-2020 22:24
Fedorenko Vassiliy
Hello to everyone!

I find it difficult, to be honest, even with the genus of the fungus. While the it's fresh, I would like to understand what it is.

Fungus grows in the mountains in a mixed forest (mostly spruce) on a ground at an altitude of ~ 1800 m.

Apothecium 9 and 21 mm. Hairs 200-430 µm long.
Ascospores in water (on photo): (12.5) 13.7 - 15.1 (15.6) × (7) 7.3 - 8.2 (8.5) µm N = 100 Qe = 1.9

Spores in the water (out of asci) have an additional shell, which is destroyed in most spores. Therefore, it hasn't yet been possible to photograph the ascospores in lactophenol with preservation of this shell.
  • message #64913
  • message #64913
  • message #64913
  • message #64913
Koszka Attila, 07-09-2020 12:04
Re : Acervus?
Hello!
I think your fungus is rather a Cheilymenia species.
Acervus has smaller spores and no hairs.
Best wishes: Attila
Mirek Gryc, 07-09-2020 14:07
Re : Acervus?
Hi
A few details do not suit me but maybe you can compare it with Cheilymenia vitellina?
View the article:
http://www.czecmycology.org/_cm/CM50305.pdf
Mirek
Fedorenko Vassiliy, 07-09-2020 21:51
Fedorenko Vassiliy
Re : Acervus?
Attila, Mirek, thank you!

Indeed, Cheilymenia vitellina looks like a good candidate. However, there are some inconsistencies with the description of the referenced article and the article by Peric (2004). The size of the apothecium is larger, while the spores are smaller, and I did't see any striation either in the LCB or on dry spores.



What can you say about the areola around the spores? I have added photos of spores and asci in LCB, and section of the fruitbodie.
  • message #64929
  • message #64929
  • message #64929
Mirek Gryc, 08-09-2020 09:08
Re : Acervus?
Hi Vassiliy.
I do not know any other species with a similar appearance and microscopic features, so I proposed a comparison with this species, although as I mentioned, not all features match it. I meet this species quite often. It grows on humus soil, usually accompanied by nettles (Urtica).
So far, the largest that I have seen were up to 1 cm in diameter.
I haven't been able to observe the spore ornamentation yet. It is said to be hard to spot.
I cannot explain the presence of a gelatinous coating around the spores. Perhaps this is due to the old age of the spores.
If you have younger fruiting bodies, why not check if the spores look similar?
I don't have any more ideas.
Mirek
Fedorenko Vassiliy, 08-09-2020 11:02
Fedorenko Vassiliy
Re : Acervus?
Hi Mirek.

Unfortunately, I found only two of these fruitbodies. They show the same picture. The first photo of ascospores in water from a small fruitbodie and photo in LCB from a large one.

Thank you! Nettle was present. Then, while I consider this fungus as Cheilymenia vitellina.

Vassiliy
Mirek Gryc, 08-09-2020 15:42
Re : Acervus?
Sometimes when the spores are overripe they don't look quite natural?
Here are two examples:



Mirek


Fedorenko Vassiliy, 09-09-2020 09:22
Fedorenko Vassiliy
Re : Acervus?
Thank you, Mirek!