Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-07-2011 23:48

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear Friends During investigation of my sample, I

21-07-2011 07:31

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsRecently on the Fagus twigs I have fou

05-07-2011 15:39

Uwe Lindemann Uwe Lindemann

Hello Forum,I have a question: J.T. Palmer should

20-07-2011 11:27

Joseph Pellicani

Bonjour.Merci de venir à mon secour pour détermi

19-07-2011 19:48

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to all:These perithecia grow on a well develop

20-07-2011 10:35

Joseph Pellicani

bonjour tout le mondeUne Pezize de grande taile &g

01-03-2011 23:52

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Buenas noches Esta especie está recogida sobre p

19-07-2011 11:25

Martin Bemmann Martin Bemmann

Dear forum,can someone provide a digital copy of t

18-07-2011 21:51

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear Friends Today, during the review of other sp

19-07-2011 09:12

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsCan you tell me whether there are any

« < 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 > »
Modern status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae in Gabarnaudia
Alex Akulov, 22-07-2011 23:48
Alex AkulovDear Friends
During investigation of my sample, I found an interesting representative of fungicolous fungi. I think it's "Oospora lasiosphariae", described in 1952 by French mycologist Gabriele Arnaud. In 1974 the name was reduced to synonyms of Gabarnaudia betae (anamorphic Sphaeronaemella).

Having studied the situation its seems to me that this decision was not entirely justified and it is possible that Oospora lasiosphariae deserves to be an independent species (as Gabarnaudia lasiosphaeriae). 

I can get culture of this species, but have no possibility to compare it with the culture of Gabarnaudia betae. Maybe someone interested in this work and will help me to understand the actual status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae?

Is anyone of you meet this species earlier?

I am waiting for your criticisms and ideas.
Alex
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961