16-03-2017 16:53
Malcolm Greaves
A little more sure that this shows all the feature
16-03-2017 11:15
Pascal RIBOLLETBonjour,je recherche la publication suivanteL.N. V
16-03-2017 09:46
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à tous,Je suis certain d'avoir déjà dé
15-03-2017 18:16
Michel RIMBAUDBonjour,Excusez-moi de m'adresser à ce site pour
15-03-2017 19:40
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à tous,Deux amies bryologues m'ont apport
12-03-2017 15:59
William Slosse
Could this be Lasiobelonium corticale?I have a sli
15-03-2017 18:39
Viktorie Halasu
Hello,I'm trying to determine a Sarcoscypha: Apoth
14-03-2017 10:58
Elsa SousaGood morning,Spores fusoid 2-3 gutullate (22.3) 2
Sarcoscypha coccinea
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 16:53
A little more sure that this shows all the features of S coccinea. The rounded spores and the straight hairs. It was found in an area of mixed fallen/felled branches and brash in a local wood. There were no salix nearby but a mixture of other deciduous and conifer trees. The fruit body was rather badly eaten so there was little of the cup edge left.Mal
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-03-2017 17:38
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Yes, it is obviously S. coccinea. Was it this one that became rare in England?
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 17:56
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Zotto Thanks.
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal