Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-04-2014 02:39

Nick Aplin

Salut à tous, I am trying (and mostly failing!)

27-04-2014 19:11

Dirk Strobelt

Salut,  ces champignons, je trouvais sur une pel

21-04-2014 16:27

Salvador Tello

Hola a todos.Tengo unas Orbilias que pienso que pu

28-04-2014 09:52

Savic Dragisa

On dead stem of Asplenium scolopendrium I found Ps

24-04-2014 09:22

Savic Dragisa

Another from Carex

23-04-2014 22:29

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found these black small frb on leaves of

27-04-2014 22:38

Leandro Sánchez Leandro Sánchez

En ribera de río sobre rama caída de planifolio,

27-04-2014 06:48

Arold Lavoie Arold Lavoie

Bonjour,J'aimerrais savoir si selon vous, il s'agi

17-01-2013 16:56

Salvador Tello

Hola a todos.Este pequeño ascomiceto estaba sobre

25-04-2014 17:11

M Jonathan M Jonathan

Sur populus tremuloides.Spores 16-20*6-7 u. asque

« < 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 > »
Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Nick Aplin, 25-04-2014 02:39

Salut à tous,


I am trying (and mostly failing!) to identify some ascomycetes in a floodplain in the South of England - I wonder if anyone can help me with this species on a dead Phalaris culm?


Collected 24/04/2014


Perithecia: Mostly immersed (some almost erumpant), 0.5 - 0.6mm diam. All ostioles rounded


Asci: Bitunicate, 8-spored


Ascospores: 5-Septate, brown and distinctly roughened on release, 26.8 - 30.6 x 6.1 - 7.2 µm. No sheath observed in indian ink


Pseudoparaphyses: around 2 µm diam, mostly unbranched, septate, without conspicuous droplets


There was an anamorph nearby which reminded me of Stagonospora (?)


I've tried looking in 'the usual' genera that I associate with grasses in this habitat (Massarina, Phaeosphaeria, Lophiotrema, Massariosphaeria etc.) but with little luck yet - Can anyone make any suggestions or at least point me in the right direction?


Amitiés,


Nick

  • message #28910
  • message #28910
  • message #28910
Björn Wergen, 25-04-2014 05:47
Björn Wergen
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Hi Nick,

my first thought was that the species belongs in the group of Phaeosphaeria luctuosa, which has a Stagonospora anamorph. This anamorph should have longer conidia as shwon on your third picture. The spores of Ph. luctuosa are furthermore described as being smooth (Leuchtmann 1984).

I do not know your species, but I have collected and studied many of these small dots on grasses and herbs. I do not wish to disturb you with sending another species :D

regards,
björn
Nick Aplin, 28-04-2014 01:25
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm

Hi Björn,


Thanks, I also thought of Phaeosphaeria at first, but was thrown off course by the spores which seemed quite lophiostomoid when immature (sorry for the poor photo).


I went back over Shoemaker & Babcock and didn't find anything that fit, though Montagnula subsuperficialis seemed very close. The authors mentioned a similar species which seems a good solution for my problem: Montagnula rhodophaea.


What do you think?


I noted that Leuchtman only described microconidia as an anamorph for this species, so perhaps my Stagonospora belongs to another fungus......


I have almost exhausted the specimen, so I would probably be wasting your time by sending this one - If I collect it again I'll post it.


Best wishes,


Nick

  • message #28952
Björn Wergen, 28-04-2014 05:56
Björn Wergen
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Hi Nick,

I think you are right, finely dotted spores are typical for Montagnula species, but also for some Leptosphaeria and Phaeosphaeria, so we have to look for hyphal structures on the surface, something like a "Stroma" or a Clypeus. A section through the pseudothecia would also help.

regards,
björn
Nick Aplin, 29-04-2014 01:05
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm

Hi Björn,


There are indeed patches of dark stromatic tissue around the pseudothecia, and surface of the host (under the epidermis) is black with fungal cells. It seem there is also a golden-red discolouration of the substrate which I think Leuchtmann describes (my German isn't very good and Google Translate doesn't help much sometimes!).


The pseudothecium wall seems OK too - I think I will label this one as M.rhodophaea unless anyone disagrees....


Best wishes,


Nick


 


 


 


 

  • message #28974
  • message #28974