Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

13-01-2015 16:33

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, tengo estas muestras sobre excremento de Ove

07-01-2015 10:51

Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel

Hola amigos, vaya en primer lugar mis mejores des

13-01-2015 10:42

Marja Pennanen

Hello folks,I found these brown, up to 1 mm wide a

11-01-2015 15:56

Nina Filippova

Another pyrophilous species was collected in the s

10-01-2015 11:58

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to all I need the next paper Morphological an

11-01-2015 10:11

Hans-Otto Baral Hans-Otto Baral

Hellocan anybody help with this presumed Trichonec

11-01-2015 15:36

Nina Filippova

Hello dear all, recent discussions about carbonic

30-12-2014 19:08

Chris Yeates Chris Yeates

Bonsoir tousrecently while preparing a 'portrait'

31-12-2014 15:44

Ralf Dahlheuser Ralf Dahlheuser

Hello all,I found this Nectria/Bryonectria ?  and

07-01-2015 15:24

Joaquin Martin

HiApothecia very, very young 0,4 mm-0,5 mm above w

« < 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 > »
Podospora posible en Oveja
Blasco Rafael, 13-01-2015 16:33
Blasco RafaelHola, tengo estas muestras sobre excremento de Oveja, lo mas cercano que encuentro es Podospora vesticola y Podospora tetraspora, pero sin ninguna seguridad, a ver que opinan.
0,27 diametro X 0,48 altura.
Ascas J- , Crozier + , 170 x 18---175 x 17---217 x 17.
Esporas con dos apendices gelatinosos de 17--19 x 11--12.
Parafisis no vistas.
pared de subglobosa a prismatica.
Pelos pared peritecio hialinos de 50--85 x 9--10.
Pelos apice peritecio 10--20--25 X 8--10.
Un saludo
Rafael
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
  • message #33176
Blasco Rafael, 13-01-2015 16:35
Blasco Rafael
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
MAS MICRO
RAFAEL
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
  • message #33177
Norbert Heine, 13-01-2015 16:56
Norbert Heine
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
Hola Rafael,

you are right with the species, but the correct name should be Schizothecium vesticola (Berk. & Broome) N. Lundq.

Regards
Norbert
Michel Delpont, 13-01-2015 17:03
Michel Delpont
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
Sans problème, Schizothecium vesticola !

Michel.
Chris Yeates, 13-01-2015 18:38
Chris Yeates
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
#Norbert
is it not better to say 'in my opinion the "preferred" name should be . . .' ?

Both Podospora vesticola (Berk. & Broome) Mirza & Cain ex Kobayasi and Schizothecium vesticola (Berk. & Broome) N. Lundq. are legitimate and therefore correct names (indeed Mycobank, I see, treats the former as its "Current Name"). I mean this as a general comment; I appreciate that in the particular case of Schizothecium v. Podospora
there are arguments on both sides.

Just a thought.
LG
Chris
Blasco Rafael, 13-01-2015 20:28
Blasco Rafael
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
Gracias Norbert y Michel.
Un saludo
Rafael
Peter Welt, 13-01-2015 21:13
Peter Welt
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
This is not right, Chris. Lundqvist has the genera already separated macroscopically and
also the genetic tests have confirmed this. see PDF

If youstudy this work is probably not uniform rather Podospora.


Also Doveri that has yet preferred Podospora, now used Schizothecium.


Peter

Chris Yeates, 13-01-2015 21:57
Chris Yeates
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
Hello Peter
I probably haven't made myself clear; I quite agree that the name to use for this fungus, based on current taxonomic arguments is Schizothecium.

I just query the use of the word 'correct'; as placement above the level of species will always be to a greater or lesser degree a matter of opinion. One only has to look at the various generic names used for many members of the Helotiales - I can think of a number of species where I don't agree with the generic placement currently used, and therefore I don't think it will prove to be the 'correct' one; but one has to use the published name currently in use, unless one wants to go to all the work of researching types etc. and publishing a new combination.

There are several legitimate names for Schizothecium vesticola, including combinations in Sordaria and Hypocopra, combinations which were probably deemed 'correct' at the stage of knowledge at the time. 'Correct' implies a level of finality which we can aspire to in mycology but will probably never achieve in many cases; perhaps 'current name' is a safer bet.

Does that make sense?
Best wishes
Chris
Norbert Heine, 14-01-2015 00:50
Norbert Heine
Re : Podospora posible en Oveja
Hello Chris,

I agree in all things with you!
Yor are right:
"Correct' implies a level of finality which we can aspire to in mycology but will probably never achieve in many cases; perhaps 'current name' is a safer bet."

But I'm not perfect in english, you know, and I think there is a difference between "the correct name should be Schizothecium vesticola (Berk. & Broome) N. Lundq.", what I said and "the correct name is...", what I would never say! You know?

Regards and thanks for your interesting remarks!

Norbert