Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-11-2025 12:01

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727

27-11-2025 11:46

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918

17-09-2025 10:50

Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

29-11-2025 08:40

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou

28-11-2025 16:45

Nogueira Héctor

November 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI

25-11-2025 14:24

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522

27-11-2025 15:41

Thomas Læssøe

Spores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;

27-11-2025 11:31

Thomas Læssøe

Collectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

26-11-2025 18:13

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Modern status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae in Gabarnaudia
Alex Akulov, 22-07-2011 23:48
Alex AkulovDear Friends
During investigation of my sample, I found an interesting representative of fungicolous fungi. I think it's "Oospora lasiosphariae", described in 1952 by French mycologist Gabriele Arnaud. In 1974 the name was reduced to synonyms of Gabarnaudia betae (anamorphic Sphaeronaemella).

Having studied the situation its seems to me that this decision was not entirely justified and it is possible that Oospora lasiosphariae deserves to be an independent species (as Gabarnaudia lasiosphaeriae). 

I can get culture of this species, but have no possibility to compare it with the culture of Gabarnaudia betae. Maybe someone interested in this work and will help me to understand the actual status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae?

Is anyone of you meet this species earlier?

I am waiting for your criticisms and ideas.
Alex
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961