Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

10-06-2026 10:45

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui

08-06-2026 10:16

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in

10-06-2026 09:24

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do

09-06-2026 18:32

Camille Mertens

Sur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia

08-06-2026 17:00

François Bartholomeeusen

Good day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de

07-06-2026 18:18

Mario Schulz

Hello everyone, i found on 31.5 the following Mol

07-06-2026 15:10

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco

05-06-2026 11:02

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596691

07-06-2026 12:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici une brève description de ce qui m

07-06-2026 12:43

Steve Clements

Bojour. This was a strange find on a stick on my

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Modern status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae in Gabarnaudia
Alex Akulov, 22-07-2011 23:48
Alex AkulovDear Friends
During investigation of my sample, I found an interesting representative of fungicolous fungi. I think it's "Oospora lasiosphariae", described in 1952 by French mycologist Gabriele Arnaud. In 1974 the name was reduced to synonyms of Gabarnaudia betae (anamorphic Sphaeronaemella).

Having studied the situation its seems to me that this decision was not entirely justified and it is possible that Oospora lasiosphariae deserves to be an independent species (as Gabarnaudia lasiosphaeriae). 

I can get culture of this species, but have no possibility to compare it with the culture of Gabarnaudia betae. Maybe someone interested in this work and will help me to understand the actual status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae?

Is anyone of you meet this species earlier?

I am waiting for your criticisms and ideas.
Alex
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961