
17-04-2012 02:28

Hello everyonewhile examining dead stems of Vaccin

16-04-2012 20:20
Hi to allI have collected these stromata with blac

17-04-2012 00:06
Peter ThompsonI found a small group of thyriothecia fruit bodies

01-02-2012 12:44

Hallo everybody,I have watched this forum quite so

15-04-2012 18:31

Hi all,I have found a very interesting lophiostomo

14-04-2012 15:46

In questi ultimi mesi ho lavorato alla catalogazio

13-04-2012 20:18
Hello,I have problems to obtain copies of the foll

12-04-2012 13:57
René DougoudChers Tous,Je recherche les publications ci-desous
lachnum literature
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 05:11

Haines JH. Studies in Hyaloscyphaceae VI: the genus Lachnum (Ascommycetes) of the Guayana Highlands. Nova Hedwigia. 1992;54:97–112.
thank you so much
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-04-2012 08:29

Re : lachnum literature
I have this paper but not in a digital version. Let's first see if someone has it.
Zotto
Zotto
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 08:52

Re : lachnum literature
I am sorry, that is the one I am missing too!
Stip
Stip
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 16:10

Re : lachnum literature
no problem! thank you so much anyway Zotto and Stip. i am waiting if somebody else have it :D !!!
Greetings :D
Greetings :D
Chris Yeates,
17-04-2012 22:44
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 22:47

Re : lachnum literature
Thanks a lot Chris,
Stip
Stip
François Valade,
18-04-2012 11:36

Re : lachnum literature
Thank you Chris.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Baeza Yajaira,
18-04-2012 16:35

Re : lachnum literature
thank you so much Chris! :D