Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-01-2017 22:23

Till Lohmeyer

Bonsoir, je cherche la citation correcte des auteu

07-01-2017 22:02

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Tengo esta Mollisia? desde mayo En madera de haya

05-01-2017 00:49

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

HelloThese small (0.15 - 0.2 mm), white Saccobolus

06-01-2017 22:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Hi everybody,I'm seachring for this articleLundqvi

26-12-2016 10:18

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

Hi, I found another rubber-orange  coloured Ascom

04-01-2017 13:30

Dragiša Savic

Hi, I accidentally found this parasitic species on

06-01-2017 09:23

Jacky Launoy

Bonjour,Quelqu'un pourait -il me procurer la publi

04-01-2017 14:04

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Galicia material seco.... Al hacer la micro no le

04-01-2017 10:04

Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

I need some help with this apothecium found in die

05-01-2017 08:27

Dragiša Savic

Hi, Pinus cone, any help is appreciated.

« < 804 805 806 807 808 > »
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer, 07-01-2017 22:23
Bonsoir,

je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:

> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)

> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)

> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)

Qui peut m'aider?

Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 00:13
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 10:25
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.

See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."

This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer, 08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 16:20
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.

Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 17:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...