03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
07-09-2025 11:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
05-09-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari
05-09-2025 18:53
Robin Isaksson
Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75
04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
Can it be?
Marja Pennanen,
31-07-2010 00:09
I've checked many and am nearly always uncertain of the species.
But now this was suprisingly easy:
Marja Pennanen,
31-07-2010 00:17
Re:Can it be?
These were even 0,5 mm wide and grow on Potentilla palustris.
Spores were about 7-11x1-1,5, asci (20-) 25-35x4-5, IKI+ and paraphyses narrow (1,5-2 micrometers wide).
The hairs were about 17-21x2,5-3 and had something on the tips (photo).
I ended to Hyaloscypha secalina var paludicola.
Second opinions?
Marja
Spores were about 7-11x1-1,5, asci (20-) 25-35x4-5, IKI+ and paraphyses narrow (1,5-2 micrometers wide).
The hairs were about 17-21x2,5-3 and had something on the tips (photo).
I ended to Hyaloscypha secalina var paludicola.
Second opinions?
Marja
Stip Helleman,
31-07-2010 21:37
Re:Can it be?
Hi Marja,
Judging your description secalina var paludosa fits well, unfortunately the photo is not giving more information.
cheers Stip
Judging your description secalina var paludosa fits well, unfortunately the photo is not giving more information.
cheers Stip
Marja Pennanen,
01-08-2010 00:21
Re:Can it be?
Thanks Stip,
I've been told, that my camera isn't very good for microphotos.
Here's one more. This gives as much information of the spores as the ealier of hairs ;)
Howdy: Marja
I've been told, that my camera isn't very good for microphotos.
Here's one more. This gives as much information of the spores as the ealier of hairs ;)
Howdy: Marja
