19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
19-03-2026 19:34
Filip Fuljer
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
19-03-2026 17:50
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
18-03-2026 17:22
Katarina PastircakovaHi there,I'm looking for the following literature:
19-03-2026 10:56
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643
27-02-2026 11:21
Yannick Mourgues
Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat
I do not want to overuse, but I still need two articles.Huhtinnen & Spooner (2003) - A redisposition of Ascophanus tityrii Velen.
Kew Bulletin 58 (3) 749-757
Kimbrough (1970) - Segregates of Ascophanus, Coprotus VS. Leporina.
Taxon 19 (5)779 -?
Who can help? Thank you Peter
I am still looking for this first article myself but i will send you another file on the tityrii species
Cheers.
Stip
Seppo and Spooner have wrote two articles on Unguiculella tityrii.
I attach two articles.
Beñat
Huhtinen-amp-Spooner-Ascophanus-tityrii-0001.pdf
last one sent to Peter (850 ko). you can requests it.
Amitiés
Françosi
Thanks again for your effort, Benat, Stib and Francosi, Friends of the Ascomycetes.
Then just one question. Does any of you have one species, which today is still determined by the names Ascophanus? From my knowledge, the species should be deleted. The former collective genus is now merged into many other genres.
What do you say to that?
Peter
PS: Zotto doubts on the nature of belonging to the genus Unguiculella tityrii, since the typical drop in oil de spores lacking.