27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
26-11-2025 18:13
Jason Karakehian
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
25-11-2025 11:03
Mick PeerdemanHi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so
Discinella meuriesii
Quijada Luis,
05-06-2014 11:44
Boudier 1917, Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 33: 117, wich contain the description of D. meuriesii.
Thanks in advance.
Luis.
François Valade,
05-06-2014 12:09
Re : Discinella meuriesii
Hello Luis
I have extracted the pages concerning D. meuresii, but if you need the complete Boudier's article, please let me know.
cheers
François
I have extracted the pages concerning D. meuresii, but if you need the complete Boudier's article, please let me know.
cheers
François
Discinella meuresii - Description
Gernot Friebes,
05-06-2014 12:22
Re : Discinella meuriesii
Hi,
it's also online: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/106612#page/315/mode/1up
Best wishes,
Gernot
it's also online: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/106612#page/315/mode/1up
Best wishes,
Gernot
Quijada Luis,
05-06-2014 12:49
Re : Discinella meuriesii
Dear François,
Thanks a lot!
Thanks a lot!
François Valade,
05-06-2014 18:48
Re : Discinella meuriesii
Dear Luis
You have to know that this name (meuresii) came from a typo error.
In Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 33: 117, Boudier referred to his english publication (Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 4(1): 323 (1913) of Calycella Mensiesi Boud. dedicated to his friend Menzies and because the choice of genus Calycella was a "lapsus memoriae" (Boudier was 85 yr old), he transferred it in Discinella.
We shall never know if Boudier or the printer made the mistake, but the species was named Discinella Meuriesi Boud., valid new species, while the legend of the plate was called Discine]la Meuziesi Boud.
I believe that letters u and z were mistaken for n and r.
What is surprizing is that Boudier was not aware of Smith and Ramsbottom transfer in Discinella menziesi (spelling corrected here) in Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 4(2): 323 (1914).
Anyway Discinella Meuriesi Boud. is a synonym of Discinella menziesii (actual orthograph in phase with name building of the code) (Boud.) A.L. Sm. & Ramsb.
Don't waste to much time on Discinella Meuriesi Boud.
cheers
François
You have to know that this name (meuresii) came from a typo error.
In Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 33: 117, Boudier referred to his english publication (Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 4(1): 323 (1913) of Calycella Mensiesi Boud. dedicated to his friend Menzies and because the choice of genus Calycella was a "lapsus memoriae" (Boudier was 85 yr old), he transferred it in Discinella.
We shall never know if Boudier or the printer made the mistake, but the species was named Discinella Meuriesi Boud., valid new species, while the legend of the plate was called Discine]la Meuziesi Boud.
I believe that letters u and z were mistaken for n and r.
What is surprizing is that Boudier was not aware of Smith and Ramsbottom transfer in Discinella menziesi (spelling corrected here) in Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 4(2): 323 (1914).
Anyway Discinella Meuriesi Boud. is a synonym of Discinella menziesii (actual orthograph in phase with name building of the code) (Boud.) A.L. Sm. & Ramsb.
Don't waste to much time on Discinella Meuriesi Boud.
cheers
François