14-05-2024 21:43
Thierry BlondelleBonjour,A côté de Hystérographium fraxini, ces
14-05-2024 09:19
Hans-Otto BaralHi, I want to announce for next Sunday 17.00 middl
14-05-2024 19:48
B Shelbourne• Hymenoscyphus: Habitat, macro, spores, paraphy
13-05-2024 12:48
Eduard OsieckAfter eight years (*) I found the same apiosporous
11-05-2024 18:08
B Shelbourne• Mollisia on tree leaves: On dead Quercus leave
12-05-2024 11:48
Michel HairaudBonjour , Voici une récolte d'une Rhytismataceae
10-05-2024 17:40
Anna KlosGood afternoon, Thursday during an inventory we f
11-05-2024 00:33
Ethan CrensonI'm not entirely sure that Encoelia-like is the ri
I would like to have more opinions about this asco, that was growing on the thallus of a lichen (of the genus Graphis), as can be observed from the first photo attached. In addition there was another parasite with similar appearance over the lichen. I was doing the microscopy of the lichen and noticed some stranges spores. Then I selected a emerging volcano and made some sections of it. From the shape of the ascospores I immediatly thought that could be a Hysterium sp.. When I measured the spores I got a surprise, the size was about the double than expected (in average 52.4 x 12.8 µm). I went to the key of Eric Boehm, available at
http://www.eboehm.com/hysterium.html
and arrived to Hysterium macrosporum. Since till now I found only two Hysterium species: H. angustatum and H. pulicarea and, according to the description given in the above website, H. macrosporum it is a very rare species, I became doubtful. Is there any other suggestion?
Thank you in advance,
zaca
Hi Zaca,
H. macrosporum is not possible because ascospores are 2-coloured.
It's close to H. pulicare but different, to my mind. But there are a big variations in H. pulicare (for example, H. pulicare Pers. and H. truncatulum, one of its synonyme) and study would be necessary.
My opinion is that your fungus is probably an ined. fungus.
Alain
PS just a question : ascopores are in water in fourth picture ?
Ragarding your question the answer is: YES. All the observation was done with water.
Regards,
zaca