14-01-2026 10:02
Hulda Caroline HolteHello, These ascomycetes were growing on standing
13-01-2026 10:13
Danny Newman
Cordieritidaceae sp. on indet. wood w/ Hypoxylon s
13-01-2026 07:57
Danny Newman
cf. Bombardia on indet. decorticate woodAppalachia
14-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Nemania sp. on indet. decorticate woodAppalachian
12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
11-01-2026 20:35
Josep Torres
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
13-01-2026 18:55
Rees CronceStrossmayeria sp. on indet. decroticate hardwoodTh
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
13-01-2026 07:14
Danny Newman
Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S
13-01-2026 09:10
Danny Newman
Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha
Incrucipulum query
Chris Yeates,
22-08-2014 14:11
Bonjour tousI recently had the opportunity to collect on Myrica gale and as I hoped I was able to find Incrucipulum sulphurellum in order to create a 'portrait' of it (see PDF, I shall submit it to the database in due course).
This is clearly the same as Lachnum cruciferum as depicted in Dennis 1949 (as Dasyscypha crucifera). I assume that the epithet 'sulphurellum' predates 'cruciferum' (although it must be by a factor of only a few months?). I am surprised that both taxa are still included separately in Species Fungorum and Mycobank - am I missing something? Unfortunately I do not have access to Baral & Krieglsteiner, Beih. Z. Mykol. 6: 72 (1985)
amitiés
Chris
Incsul0a-0001.pdf
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 14:21
Re : Incrucipulum query
Hi Chris,
they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..
Cheers
Martin
they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..
Cheers
Martin
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 15:16
Re : Incrucipulum query
Phillips' publication is dated 28. September 1878. Stafleu gives for Peck's Report no. 30 also September 1878..... ;-)
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 21:42
Re : Incrucipulum query
Me again...
there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.
Regards
Martin
PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.
Regards
Martin
PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
Chris Yeates,
22-08-2014 22:42
Re : Incrucipulum query
Thanks for all that work Martin! I love a good detective story . . . . ;-)
LG
Chris
LG
Chris
Martin Bemmann,
22-08-2014 22:53
Re : Incrucipulum query
Dear Chris,
being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.
Best regards
Martin
being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.
Best regards
Martin