Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-12-2025 18:35

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous/Hi to everyone I am passing along

21-11-2025 10:47

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Peut-être Mollisia palustris ?Trouvée su

15-12-2025 15:48

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Melanospora cf. lagenaria on old, rotting, fallen

15-12-2025 15:54

Johan Boonefaes Johan Boonefaes

Unknown anamorph found on the ground in coastal sa

15-12-2025 21:11

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

Small clavate hairs, negative croziers and IKI bb

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

15-12-2025 21:47

Pol Debaenst

Good evening, On 12/11/2025 I found ascomycetes w

15-12-2025 07:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb

15-12-2025 11:49

Danny Newman Danny Newman

ITS sequences from the following two collections B

15-12-2025 12:34

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rhytismataceae on oak leafnear Purchase Roa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Incrucipulum query
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 14:11
Chris YeatesBonjour tous
I recently had the opportunity to collect on Myrica gale and as I hoped I was able to find Incrucipulum sulphurellum in order to create a 'portrait' of it (see PDF, I shall submit it to the database in due course).
This is clearly the same as Lachnum cruciferum as depicted in Dennis 1949 (as Dasyscypha crucifera). I assume that the epithet 'sulphurellum' predates 'cruciferum' (although it must be by a factor of only a few months?). I am surprised that both taxa are still included separately in Species Fungorum and Mycobank - am I missing something? Unfortunately I do not have access to Baral & Krieglsteiner, Beih. Z. Mykol. 6: 72 (1985)
amitiés
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 14:21
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Hi Chris,

they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..

Cheers
Martin
  • message #30980
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 15:16
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Phillips' publication is dated 28. September 1878. Stafleu gives for Peck's Report no. 30 also September 1878..... ;-)
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
  • message #30981
  • message #30981
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 21:42
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Me again...

there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.

Regards
Martin

PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
  • message #30984
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 22:42
Chris Yeates
Re : Incrucipulum query
Thanks for all that work Martin! I love a good detective story . . . . ;-)
LG
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 22:53
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Dear Chris,

being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.

Best regards
Martin