Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-05-2015 11:03

hannie wijers

Hello, I would like to ask some help for a proble

05-05-2015 11:53

Francisco Javier Mateos Francisco Javier Mateos

This super small mushroom I found it in the beech

01-04-2015 12:28

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This small group of apothecia were on decorticated

03-05-2015 00:11

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à tous,Trouvé ce jour sur crottin de che

30-04-2015 20:42

Nina Filippova

Good evening, these very rich apothecia were foun

04-05-2015 12:37

Björn Wergen Björn Wergen

Hi friends,I am looking for this article: YanMin

02-05-2015 17:32

Nina Filippova

Hello,this beautiful species was growing on a fall

04-05-2015 08:12

Philippe Louasse

Bonjour, Mycologue amateur et de plus en plus intÃ

21-04-2015 08:00

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola tengo this Muestra Recogida sobrio tallo de g

03-05-2015 14:15

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear all,After two months moistening a small conta

« < 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 > »
Incrucipulum query
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 14:11
Chris YeatesBonjour tous
I recently had the opportunity to collect on Myrica gale and as I hoped I was able to find Incrucipulum sulphurellum in order to create a 'portrait' of it (see PDF, I shall submit it to the database in due course).
This is clearly the same as Lachnum cruciferum as depicted in Dennis 1949 (as Dasyscypha crucifera). I assume that the epithet 'sulphurellum' predates 'cruciferum' (although it must be by a factor of only a few months?). I am surprised that both taxa are still included separately in Species Fungorum and Mycobank - am I missing something? Unfortunately I do not have access to Baral & Krieglsteiner, Beih. Z. Mykol. 6: 72 (1985)
amitiés
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 14:21
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Hi Chris,

they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..

Cheers
Martin
  • message #30980
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 15:16
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Phillips' publication is dated 28. September 1878. Stafleu gives for Peck's Report no. 30 also September 1878..... ;-)
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
  • message #30981
  • message #30981
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 21:42
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Me again...

there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.

Regards
Martin

PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
  • message #30984
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 22:42
Chris Yeates
Re : Incrucipulum query
Thanks for all that work Martin! I love a good detective story . . . . ;-)
LG
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 22:53
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Dear Chris,

being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.

Best regards
Martin