Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

01-11-2025 09:14

Francis Maggi

Bonjour,Trouvé sur Xanthoria parietina à Valdebl

28-10-2025 19:33

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r

31-10-2025 09:19

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

Can somebody provide me with a file of:Rogerson CT

30-10-2025 03:53

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I would like an opinion on whether this

09-08-2025 13:13

Maria Plekkenpol Maria Plekkenpol

Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth

29-10-2025 19:02

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De la pasada semana en rama posiblemente de hayaPi

25-11-2016 13:54

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

Hi, I found numerous seeds of Washingtonia robusta

28-10-2025 22:22

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello.I'm searching for the following paper:Punith

27-10-2025 19:51

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Who has this article? Doveri, F. 2007. Sporormiel

28-10-2025 15:37

Carl Farmer

I'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Non Asco
Malcolm Greaves, 13-02-2015 21:38
Malcolm  GreavesI came across this growing on and around some Podospora on sheep dung and although I think it might be a Hyphomycete and I know that is not the purpose of this forum but has anyone come across anything similar.
The distinctive multi septate spores are up to 90 x 10.5.
Thanks
Mal
  • message #33808
  • message #33808
Hans-Otto Baral, 13-02-2015 22:02
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Non Asco
This looks much like the anamorph of Orbilia fimicoloides, Dactylella oxyspora. Conidial size fits well.

Zotto
Mateusz Wilk, 13-02-2015 22:03
Re : Non Asco
Dear Malcolm,

Could be some species of Dactylella, these are nematophagous fungi and occur often on plant litter or dung.
No idea about the species...

Best wishes,
Mateusz
Mateusz Wilk, 13-02-2015 22:05
Re : Non Asco
Blast!
Zotto was faster and much more precise again!;)

Mateusz
Hans-Otto Baral, 13-02-2015 22:14
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Non Asco
And I should add that Dactylella is in fact non-nematophagous, although very closely related to the nematophagous group. This is strange because this species was repeatedly found on dung, though more often on herbaceous stems.
Mateusz Wilk, 13-02-2015 22:32
Re : Non Asco
Ah, indeed, I see now that after the revision by Rubner (1996) all nematophagous species were excluded. I remember some older studies, by Drechsler from 1940', and by Cooke and Dickinson (1965), where all those Dactylella and Monacrosporium were treated together.
I have observed them more frequently on strongly decayed plant material with abundant infestation with nematodes and other fauna, and I thougth that was not a coincidence. But indeed I have never seen the very act of capturing the prey, nor I was able to see any adhesive hyphae.

Mateusz
Hans-Otto Baral, 13-02-2015 22:46
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Non Asco
It is right that in earlier times the genera were separated by conidial septation and conidiophore types, bit since the genetic work of Hagedorn and Scholler the trapping organs play the major role.  These organs are indeed not easily discovered. We have seen them occasionally on the natural substrate (constricting rings, adhesive knobs and pegs, but never adhesive nets).
Chris Yeates, 13-02-2015 23:17
Chris Yeates
Re : Non Asco
@Malcolm
It should also be said that 'hyphomycetes' and 'coelomycetes' - at least the vast majority of them - are anamorphic Ascomycota, and therefore very much included in "the purpose of this forum" ;-)
kind regards
Chris
Malcolm Greaves, 15-02-2015 15:03
Malcolm  Greaves
Re : Non Asco
Thanks all for this information.
Mal