Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-09-2025 08:35

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour amis mycologues,Trouvé sur moquette de ch

17-09-2025 19:43

Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ

18-09-2025 19:40

Sylvie Le Goff

BonjourPensez vous que le genre Pulvinula puisse c

18-09-2025 16:14

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello,I am looking for a copy of following paper:H

17-09-2025 16:14

Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies enterrées, fermées au début puis s'

17-09-2025 10:50

Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

16-09-2025 12:53

Philippe PELLICIER

Pézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer, 07-01-2017 22:23
Bonsoir,

je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:

> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)

> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)

> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)

Qui peut m'aider?

Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 00:13
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 10:25
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.

See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."

This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer, 08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 16:20
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.

Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 17:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...