23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
15-10-2025 16:39
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci
03-10-2025 13:44
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus
13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,
11-10-2025 20:27
Marcel Heyligen
Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro
09-10-2025 22:14
S. RebeccaWe just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au
10-10-2025 00:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw
Locquin 1981
Ibai Olariaga Ibarguren,
05-12-2019 19:35
Dear colleagues,
I was wondering if anyone could provide a pdf of this paper:
Loquin MV 1981. Entaxie, taxotropie, néguentropie, valeur et qualité en taxinomie généralisée. Ark´All Communications 7(2): 45-86.
I know Zotto asked for it before, but it seems that nobody had it and it is very difficult to find. It turns out that Locquin cited for the first time many family names there, and though it is very unlikely, we want make sure that they were not validly published.
Can anyone help? Many thanks in advance.
Warm regards,
Ibai.
Martin Bemmann,
05-12-2019 20:17
Re : Locquin 1981
Hi Ibai,
this publication seems to be very hard to find. Even at the homepage of the editors it is not available, even not to members:
Thus it is cited mostly with the remark "not seen" or "n. vid." and Loquin's Mycologie generale et structurale, Paris 1984 is cited as a substitute.
Regards
Martin
Ibai Olariaga Ibarguren,
11-12-2019 16:30
Re : Locquin 1981
Dear Martin,
Many thanks for your answer. I was hoping that somebody would have it. I will go on trying and post it here if I ever succeed.
Cheers,
Ibai.
James Mitchell,
21-09-2022 20:25
Re : Locquin 1981
Hi Ibai,
I got my hands on a scan of it (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QIuXvDmuLttMgiuyQSa2E_aZ2cqjUySi/view?usp=sharing), but as far as I can tell, he did not publish any new taxa at all. I wonder then what Locquin was indicating in his 1984 book....
Best,
James
I got my hands on a scan of it (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QIuXvDmuLttMgiuyQSa2E_aZ2cqjUySi/view?usp=sharing), but as far as I can tell, he did not publish any new taxa at all. I wonder then what Locquin was indicating in his 1984 book....
Best,
James