28-07-2011 18:31
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
Lachnum sp.
Åge Oterhals,
09-02-2026 11:42
I found this Lachnum on old hardwood twig yesterday.
Apothecium 1,1-1,3 mm, stipe 1,3 mm.
Hairs with abundant crystals, 81- 110 x 2,9 µm
Paraphysis protruding 10-22 µm ; narrow lanceolate with width 3,8-4,4 µm
Asci 65-73 x 5,4-6,4 µm, I+.
Sp. 10-12,2 x 2,8-3,4 µm (N=10)
Regards,
Åge
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-02-2026 15:03
Re : Lachnum sp.
I think this is L. virgineum. The hair contens and length are as I expect, and the asci look like having croziers.
The spores look a bit wide but I measure only 3 µm as a maximum according to your scale.
Åge Oterhals,
09-02-2026 16:55
Re : Lachnum sp.
Thank you Zotto,
I can confirm that the asci have croziers.
The wider than normal (1,5-2,5 um) spores confused me. On average the 10 measured spores have a width of 3,1 um. This is still within an acceptable variability for the species?
Best,
Åge
I can confirm that the asci have croziers.
The wider than normal (1,5-2,5 um) spores confused me. On average the 10 measured spores have a width of 3,1 um. This is still within an acceptable variability for the species?
Best,
Åge
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-02-2026 17:26
Re : Lachnum sp.
1.5-2.5 µm stands in Ellis & Ellis. I doubt that they mearured living spores. The spores are really large, but I have no other idea. You ascus data refer to dead asci which is likewise a bit much.
Åge Oterhals,
09-02-2026 17:42
Re : Lachnum sp.
Thanks for the clarification.
Best,
Åge
Best,
Åge







