Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

15-02-2026 04:32

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

One more specimen that is giving me some descent a

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

17-02-2026 13:41

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir

16-02-2026 18:34

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

16-02-2026 17:14

Joanne Taylor

Last week we published the following paper where w

16-02-2026 16:53

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lophiostomataceae
Gernot Friebes, 16-03-2010 21:10
Hi,

here I have a second indeterminate pyreno which grew on the bark of a living Fraxinus. The ascomata are very conspicuous because they can be from Navicella-like with a small, slit-shaped neck to even Ceratostomella-like with a long and thin neck (I checked that they really are of the same species). The spores are 22,5-25 x 8-9 µm, mature always 4-celled and slightly rough, often with two paler end-cells. The asci are bitunicate and 8-spored. I didn't find a species within the Lophiostomataceae which would fit with my species.

Best wishes and many thanks,

Gernot
  • message #10802
Gernot Friebes, 16-03-2010 21:11
Re:Lophiostomataceae
micros (scale=10 µm):
  • message #10803
Christian Lechat, 16-03-2010 21:16
Christian Lechat
Re:Lophiostomataceae
Hi, Gernot,
I think your fungus is maybe Lophiostoma maculans H. Fabre
All the best,
Christian
Gernot Friebes, 16-03-2010 22:18
Re:Lophiostomataceae
Hi Christian,

thank you very much! The photos of your find and the description by Saccardo fit quite well. It seems to be a rare species, at least there is apparently not much literature on it. Even google provides only few hits.

Best wishes,

Gernot