31-03-2026 08:19
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider Ã
30-03-2026 12:03
William Slosse
Hello all,On 27/03/26, in Kraaiveld in Wingene (Be
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
30-03-2026 09:53
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourVoici des petites fructifications poilues s
27-03-2026 10:47
Ã…ge OterhalsI have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f
28-03-2026 07:55
Marc Detollenaere
Hello everybody,Yesterday I found a number of whit
26-03-2026 15:31
Ã…ke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
27-03-2026 15:23
Gernot FriebesHi,this Trichopezizella deviates from typical T. b
Annulusmagnus?
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 12:35
On a Fagus log lying in mud of pond, soc. Orbilia luteorubella (Tübingen). Sp. *16.5-21 x 6-6.7 µm. Asci with striking inamyloid apical ring.The log is flooded after heavy rain, and the mud permanently moist in drier times.
It reminds me of Annulusmagnus triseptatus but spores early turn brown.
Zotto
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 12:36
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Micro
Gernot Friebes,
28-08-2010 12:59
Re:Annulusmagnus?
maybe Ascitendus austriacus. This species should have delicately striate spores.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Best wishes,
Gernot
Alain GARDIENNET,
28-08-2010 13:31
Re:Annulusmagnus?
I'm agree with Gernot.
Alain
Alain
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 19:51
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Thanks, I never heard of that genus, nor Ascolacicola where it was first described. Is that only known from the type collection??? Incredible to believe.
The asci are with (dead) 130-140 x 9-10 µm a bit short (protologue: 160-200 x 8.5-10.5). The spores are smooth, in my opinion, but the protologue says nothing of a striation. In any case, this fits quite well!
Was the species redescribed later? I do not have Campbell + Shearer 2004. Nothing is said on the spore guttules, as usually.
Zotto
The asci are with (dead) 130-140 x 9-10 µm a bit short (protologue: 160-200 x 8.5-10.5). The spores are smooth, in my opinion, but the protologue says nothing of a striation. In any case, this fits quite well!
Was the species redescribed later? I do not have Campbell + Shearer 2004. Nothing is said on the spore guttules, as usually.
Zotto
Gernot Friebes,
28-08-2010 20:23
Re:Annulusmagnus?
here you can find Campbell & Shearer (2004):
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/96/4/822
Best wishes,
Gernot
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/96/4/822
Best wishes,
Gernot
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 21:46
Re:Annulusmagnus?
I now found that the spores become partly distinctly longitudinally striate when I put them in Melzer! Thereby they shrink a bit from 6-6.7 to 5.6-6.5 µm. Here a pic in water (live)
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 21:50
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Here in Melzer.
I did not yet read the Campbell article but I am surprized that they describe a new genus for every species... Has that any sense?
Zotto
I did not yet read the Campbell article but I am surprized that they describe a new genus for every species... Has that any sense?
Zotto
Guy Garcia,
29-08-2010 08:40
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Hi Zotto,
You can download the paper here
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/reprint/96/4/822.pdf
Best, Guy
You can download the paper here
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/reprint/96/4/822.pdf
Best, Guy