25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
Wondering if an ID to genus is possible from this photograph alone, no microscopy. Any and all input is greatly appreciated.Many thanks in advance,
-Danny
it looks like a Cenangium species
cheers,
Stip
Cenangium finally develops its apothecia above the substrate, while on the photo, the apothecia remain immersed in the substrate. If there is a stroma, we have to do with a Rhytismatales, a Coccomyces species maybe.
Regards,
Bernard
Coccomyces is not a bad idea, but I do not see a difference to Cenangium in the development, both genera are erumpent and may finally look superficial, unless a section is made.
The substrate looks for me like Quercus. Given this is right, the fungus reminds me a bit of Cenangiopsis quercicola, a species with characteristic lanceolate protruding paraphyses.
Zotto
Thanks to all for your comments. I've added a few more pictures, though none of them show much more detail than the first, I'm afraid.
Coccomyces looks plausible, at least in the formation of those black petal-like formations beneath the hymenial layer (technical term?), but size and substrate cause me to speculate. Although there's no scale in any of the four photographs, if I had to guess, I would put the diameter of these fruit bodies at around or above several mm each. Coccomyces appear to not only be much smaller (mycobank descriptions measure them in hundreds of microns) but also primarily confined to leafy substrates. Though it's difficult to see in the photos posted, there appears to be the presence of outer excipular hairs as well.
Cenangiopsis quercola doesn't look right. There's none of the thin, satin-black border as seen on several of these fruit bodies. The hymenium seen here is golden yellow as opposed to C. quercola's which is a white/purple-brown. The hairs here are much less pronounced than on C. quercola as well. To what extent can each of these characteristics vary with conditions or age?
I've asked the collector for substrate and scale information and will report back here if/when he has any additional information.
Thanks again for your contributions.




