
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

11-10-2025 20:27

Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro

09-10-2025 22:14
S. RebeccaWe just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au

10-10-2025 00:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw

Many thanks in advance,
-Danny

it looks like a Cenangium species
cheers,
Stip

Cenangium finally develops its apothecia above the substrate, while on the photo, the apothecia remain immersed in the substrate. If there is a stroma, we have to do with a Rhytismatales, a Coccomyces species maybe.
Regards,
Bernard

Coccomyces is not a bad idea, but I do not see a difference to Cenangium in the development, both genera are erumpent and may finally look superficial, unless a section is made.
The substrate looks for me like Quercus. Given this is right, the fungus reminds me a bit of Cenangiopsis quercicola, a species with characteristic lanceolate protruding paraphyses.
Zotto

Thanks to all for your comments. I've added a few more pictures, though none of them show much more detail than the first, I'm afraid.
Coccomyces looks plausible, at least in the formation of those black petal-like formations beneath the hymenial layer (technical term?), but size and substrate cause me to speculate. Although there's no scale in any of the four photographs, if I had to guess, I would put the diameter of these fruit bodies at around or above several mm each. Coccomyces appear to not only be much smaller (mycobank descriptions measure them in hundreds of microns) but also primarily confined to leafy substrates. Though it's difficult to see in the photos posted, there appears to be the presence of outer excipular hairs as well.
Cenangiopsis quercola doesn't look right. There's none of the thin, satin-black border as seen on several of these fruit bodies. The hymenium seen here is golden yellow as opposed to C. quercola's which is a white/purple-brown. The hairs here are much less pronounced than on C. quercola as well. To what extent can each of these characteristics vary with conditions or age?
I've asked the collector for substrate and scale information and will report back here if/when he has any additional information.
Thanks again for your contributions.