Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

16-06-2011 18:41

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Même site, haute Ardenne. Sur gaines pourrissante

14-06-2011 12:51

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Même site. Il y en a, des espèces, sur Typha.Apo

13-06-2011 14:45

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to all: Can you help me with this article or so

05-06-2011 20:55

Raúl Tena Lahoz Raúl Tena Lahoz

Hi to all!I´m testing the changes (bravo!) and wa

09-06-2011 21:00

erio camporesi erio camporesi

Hi to all,    is the following allocation right

12-06-2011 20:06

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour,Nous remercions les participants de Mella

08-06-2011 20:21

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to all:Do you know this Nectria, Calonectria (?

07-06-2011 13:23

Yatsiuk Iryna Yatsiuk Iryna

Hello, Forum! I have 2 findings of Gyromitra, col

07-06-2011 18:55

Anthony Thibault Anthony Thibault

Bonjour,Nous venons de procéder à la mise à jou

08-06-2011 18:46

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Bonjour à tous, Quelqu'un aurait-il la descriptio

« < 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 > »
Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Luc Bailly, 29-06-2011 23:06
Luc BaillyBihain toujours, massif de massettes, sur gaines pourries.

Apoth. pulvinées, sessiles, "charnues", minuscules (1/4 mm), complètement furfuracées, cendrées par la translucidité, apparemment hyalines, à marge émoussée à peine visible. Pas très mûr.
Asques 8-sp., sp. bisériées; IKI BB
Sp. mesurées dans l'asque (spécimens pas assez mûrs) 9-10.5 x 2.5-3 µ, hyalines, huile = 0; quelques inclusions sont visibles une fois les sp. hors de l'asque.
Paraphyses cylindriques, un peu renflées au sommet, ne dépassant pas les asques, hyalines, avec quelques inclusions, x 1.5-2 µ.
Exc. ectal de texture pseudoparenchymateuse; pas de poils.

Une idée?

Amitiés - LUC.
  • message #15677
  • message #15677
  • message #15677
  • message #15677
  • message #15677
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2011 07:54
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Hi Luc

that belongs perhaps  in the group of "Helotium" microspis. I cannto tell at present if there are several species which might deserve that name, and which is the correct one.

In England we ha d an abundant collection, but spores were longer and narrower there: *8.3-12.7 x 2-2.7 µm?.

Zotto
  • message #15682
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2011 08:02
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
here another photo. How is it possible to add several photos at once?
  • message #15683
Alain GARDIENNET, 30-06-2011 09:50
Alain GARDIENNET
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Hi Zotto, it's easy : when you join a photo, you click on "Nouvelle photo" (or perhaps "new photo" for the english users).
Alain
Luc Bailly, 30-06-2011 10:59
Luc Bailly
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Thank you, Zotto.
If needed, I know the place quite well, I can check and see if I find further specimens if needed.
Cheers - LUC.
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2011 12:26
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Alain: I clicked nouvelle photo after adding the first, but then the first was replaced by the second.

Here I add a macro of the English find on Juncus
  • message #15686
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2011 12:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Luc, your collection might perhaps better fit to the present one (Mecklenburg, on Glyceria), because of the spores. But this has striking VBs in the paraphyses and marginal cells, which I did not see in the one from England. Maybe your specimen was not alive enough. So if you find it again, please have a look for these inclusions.

Now I try to attach two images....

Zotto
  • message #15687
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-06-2011 12:32
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Doesn't work. I attached a drawing by Stip, with the same VBs in the paraphyses, so probably the same species. Here the Glyceria-find:
  • message #15688
Luc Bailly, 30-06-2011 14:14
Luc Bailly
Re : Pulviné, s/ Typha latifolia
Hi Zotto,

This is very similar, indeed. Okay, I'll check for better samples the next time I visit that bog.
It was very close to the water surface indeed, at the point I'm not surprised it could be an aquatic species.

Cheers - LUC.