07-09-2025 11:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
05-09-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari
05-09-2025 18:53
Robin Isaksson
Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75
03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
searching for literature
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 12:21
Hello,I am looking for literature about Lophiostoma or Lophiostomataceae. I have found a lophiostomoid species growing on monocotyle substrate which is definitely not L. semiliberum. Looking for articles around here does not help. Perhaps someone has a digital version of HOLM&HOLM 1988.
I would be very thankful for it :)
regards,
björn
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 12:30
Re : searching for literature
By the way, this is the unidentified Lophiostomataceae. There is no gelatinous sheath (I haven't Indian Ink yet...but it will be on the way).
Jacques Fournier,
29-02-2012 13:44
Re : searching for literature
Hi Bjorn,
I just sent you the pdf. Lophiotrema vagabundum is a possible match. If so the spores should have a wide mucilaginous sheath, very difficult to make out in water. You must try India ink.
Cheers,
Jacques
I just sent you the pdf. Lophiotrema vagabundum is a possible match. If so the spores should have a wide mucilaginous sheath, very difficult to make out in water. You must try India ink.
Cheers,
Jacques
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 14:30
Re : searching for literature
Thank you very much Jacques, I have to try this :)
regards,
björn
regards,
björn
Bernard Declercq,
02-03-2012 12:37
Re : searching for literature
Hi Jacques,
According one of your papers (Zhuang & al. 2009) Lophiotrema vagabundum (Sacc.) Sacc. would be the correct name?
I read somewhere that "Lophiostoma" vagabundum sensu Chesters & Bell (1970:22) has smaller spores. Is there in the mean time a good name for the latter taxon?
Best regards,
Bernard
According one of your papers (Zhuang & al. 2009) Lophiotrema vagabundum (Sacc.) Sacc. would be the correct name?
I read somewhere that "Lophiostoma" vagabundum sensu Chesters & Bell (1970:22) has smaller spores. Is there in the mean time a good name for the latter taxon?
Best regards,
Bernard