19-12-2025 10:10
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour, récolte réalisée en milieu dunaire, a
18-12-2025 17:23
Bruno Coué
Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c
18-12-2025 21:17
Pol DebaenstThe identification took me to Byssonectria deformi
18-12-2025 18:07
Margot en Geert VullingsThese plumes were found on rotten wood.They strong
17-12-2025 18:35
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour à tous/Hi to everyone I am passing along
15-12-2025 15:48
Danny Newman
Melanospora cf. lagenaria on old, rotting, fallen
15-12-2025 15:54
Johan Boonefaes
Unknown anamorph found on the ground in coastal sa
15-12-2025 21:11
Hardware Tony
Small clavate hairs, negative croziers and IKI bb
15-12-2025 07:09
Danny Newman
indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc
Melanomma subdispersum
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 07:58
Bonjour, Quelqu'un parmi vous connait-il bien Melanomma subdispersum ?
Does somebody well know Melanomma subdispersum ?
Ce champignon est donné usuellement sur Betula, mais a déjà été observé aussi sur Sorbus.
Les spores que je vous montre sont celles d'une récolte personnelle sur Sorbus aria. Elles mesurent 22-26 x 8-10 µm. Reconnaissez-vous Melanomma subdispersum ?
Alain
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 21:44
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 21:55
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Bjorn,
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed) . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed) . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 23:43
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
08-03-2013 08:00
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Björn,
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
Yannick Mourgues,
15-03-2013 20:21
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Salut Alain.
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick