27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
26-11-2025 18:13
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
25-11-2025 11:03
Mick PeerdemanHi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so
Podospora anserina/pauciseta
Joop van der Lee,
26-04-2013 11:04
Found on cow dung.Asci: 166.12-172.52x25.48-28.11 um
Spores: 34-07-40.97x18.43-25.88 um
Pedicel: 18.58-19.39x3.94-4.53 um
Upper cauda: 6.47 um wide (photo-5)
Fugaceous secondary appendages attached to pedicel (photo-8)
No phialides observed
No lower cauda observed.
P. Anserina is close to P. Comata but the latter has smaller spores
Michel Delpont,
26-04-2013 16:55
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Hello Joop.
The lower caudal is often ephemeral, it is well Podospora anserina.
Michel.
The lower caudal is often ephemeral, it is well Podospora anserina.
Michel.
Joop van der Lee,
26-04-2013 21:06
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Merci beaucooup Michel
Norbert Heine,
26-04-2013 22:47
Re : Podospora Anserina?
Hello Joop and Michel,
the species seems to be clear, but what about the name?
I prefer the name Podospora pauciseta (Ces.) Traverso, because the epithet pauciseta is older than anserina.
Look also at IF, Mycobank.org and Lundqvist!
Don't know, why Francesco Doveri favours anserina?
Norbert
the species seems to be clear, but what about the name?
I prefer the name Podospora pauciseta (Ces.) Traverso, because the epithet pauciseta is older than anserina.
Look also at IF, Mycobank.org and Lundqvist!
Don't know, why Francesco Doveri favours anserina?
Norbert
Joop van der Lee,
27-04-2013 00:45
Re : Podospora Anserina?
I will change the name Norbert.
But on the other hand in The Canadian Journal of Botany from 1969 there is an article from J.H Mirza and R.F Cain called Revisions of the genus Podospora that handles P. Anserina and does not mention the name you provided.
But on the other hand in The Canadian Journal of Botany from 1969 there is an article from J.H Mirza and R.F Cain called Revisions of the genus Podospora that handles P. Anserina and does not mention the name you provided.







