22-05-2026 18:12
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... in moist chamber from Portugal.As the fungus s
11-01-2022 16:36
Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
20-05-2026 17:47
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l
22-05-2026 14:47
Gernot FriebesHi,superficial ascomata collected on bark of a liv
22-05-2026 14:44
Lothar Krieglsteiner
in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi
22-05-2026 13:29
Gernot FriebesHi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater
22-05-2026 10:59
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Trouvé sur Phragmites, ce que je pense être un L
20-05-2026 21:49
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye
21-05-2026 17:01
Pierre RepellinBonjour à toutes et à tous,Je recherche l'articl
20-05-2026 20:08
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,another quite distinctive find from M
Hi evrybody,Apothecia 7-15mm in diameter, on a small slope of a mountain stream to 1826 m. in altitude between roots of Juniperus communis and next to bryophytes. Stalk very short, almost hidden in the adhering earth. Smell unpleasant, sulfurous components.
Microscopy:
Spores oval, smooth, (15.8) 16.3 to 18 (18.5) x (9.2) 9.4 to 10.3 (10.8) µm, Q = (1.6) 1.64 to 1.8 (1.9), N = 62;I = 17.2 x 9.9 µm; Qe = 1.7, enveloped in a mucilaginous sheath (0.9) 0.95 to 1.5 (1.7) µm;Me = 1.2 µm.
Asci no amyloid, 266.8 to 295.9 x 13.2 to 15.2 µm; I = 282.6 x 14.4 m. Bifurcated or single base.
Paraphyses filiform, septate, slightly widened at apex, often with diverticulate growths.
Marginal hyphae septate, sinuous and rather variable morphology, apex widened, more or less diverticulate (3.8) 3.9 to 6.9 (7.7) µm thick.
Texture of two types: under hymenium, texture intricata from 160.9 to 181.7µm formed by hyphae (4.5) from 5.1 to 8 (9.4) ?m. Then, texture
globuloso-angularis 90.7 to 102.89 µm, with elements of (17.3) 19.2 to 27.7 (28.8) µm in diameter.
According to the work "GARNWEIDNER, E., T. R. LOHMEYER, H. MARXMÜLLER (1991) Vel-Geopysis foetida., G. Alpine v. Taxa nahestehende und Höhnel - mehr als Fragen Antworten", mucilaginous sheath of spores and stipe barely evident, appears to be an important element that distinguishes Geopysis alpina.
My spores measurements are somewhat larger than those defined in this work, but I do not know how important it can be.
I would like to seek your opinion on this collection.
I have write Geopysis instead of Geopyxis!!
Hi Fermin.
This collection enters in the alpina/foetida complex. I sequenced collections with and without smell, and all are the same...
Nico
I'm afraid that.








