Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-02-2023 22:28

Ethan Crenson

Hello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

19-02-2026 13:50

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-

19-02-2026 12:01

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia (España), recole

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eutypa lejoplaca?
Garcia Susana, 23-01-2014 14:32
Hi all

I found this Pyrenomycete, growing on wood of Acer campestre.
Perithecia size is 200-260um in diameter. Ostioles are 115-140um in diameter and have a cruciform shape.
Asci measured 55-68 × 5-7um, area spores 15-23 × 5-6.5um. With IKI, the apical apparatus becomes more apparent, but I'm not able to say if it is IKI +. in any case would be weakly positive.
Persistent paraphyses.

Following keys Rappaz, came to Eutypa Lejoplaca but I doubt if it could be another species, such as E. maura, or leptoplaca (if I consider the reaction to IKI is +).


Can anyone identify the species with the data provided?


Thank you,


Susana (Spain)

  • message #27030
  • message #27030
  • message #27030
  • message #27030
Jacques Fournier, 23-01-2014 17:49
Jacques Fournier
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Hola Susana,
you are right, your fungus is likely around E. leptoplaca and E. lejoplaca. Eutypa maura can be ruled out because it is distinctive in having more immersed perithecia and the wood markedly blackened beneath the surface between the necks.
The most reliable difference between the two species is the reaction of the apical apparatus to iodine.
I suggest you follow Rappaz's procedure with a short pretreatment of perithecial content in 3% KOH and mounting in Melzer's reagent. This leads to a more drastic retraction of the ascal content than IKI and makes the apical apparatus easier to make out. Remember it is in fact subapical, at the bottom of a shallow tubular structure. The thing is to work on a very small amount of material in order to make a very thin slide, otherwise interpreting the iodine reaction is most often tricky, especially in species where the apical apparatus is very small. This applies to all species of Diatrypaceae since the character of reaction to iodine is crucial.
Come back with a clear result, whatever how long it takes!
Cheers,
Jacques
Garcia Susana, 23-01-2014 21:50
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Salut Jacques

¿C'est la réaction tout aussi intense avec KOH + Melzer, qui KOH + IKI?


J'ai fait quelques préparations KOH + IKI (je n'ai pas de Melzer) et pense que c'est positif, j'observe dans les asques un couple de très petits points que je dirais sont bleus.


Que pensez-vous?


Saludos


Susana

  • message #27050
Jacques Fournier, 24-01-2014 08:56
Jacques Fournier
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Hola Susana,
ton excellente photo montre bien une réaction positive, amyloide. Tu peux donc écarter lejoplaca.
E. leptoplaca est beaucoup plus fréquente sur Fraxinus, tu devrais la trouver facilement sur des petites branches tombées récemment avec le vent et tu pourras ainsi lui comparer ta récolte.
Amitiés,
Jacques
Garcia Susana, 24-01-2014 11:04
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Muchas gracias Jacques

Saludos.
Susana