30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
23-05-2026 11:44
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro
25-05-2026 16:44
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,During an excursion organised by
26-05-2026 21:25
Dirk GerstnerHello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li
Thecotheus holmskjoldii
Joop van der Lee,
29-01-2014 20:17
Found on cow dungFruitbody does not have a well defined form.
Asci: 268-357x46-55 um.
Spores: 30-32x15-16 um; uniseriate; containing a de Bary bubble; surrounded by a gelatinous sheath; covered with small wrats
Peter Püwert,
29-01-2014 20:43
Re : Thecotheus?
Hello Joop,
in my opinion is this Thecotheus holmskjoldii, but in unripe condition. I see at some spores appendices at the ends.
The warts on the spores are not yet instruct. How You see, (say, what a nonsens) are the fruitbodies in the shape very indifferent.
Greetings Peter.
in my opinion is this Thecotheus holmskjoldii, but in unripe condition. I see at some spores appendices at the ends.
The warts on the spores are not yet instruct. How You see, (say, what a nonsens) are the fruitbodies in the shape very indifferent.
Greetings Peter.
Gilbert MOYNE,
29-01-2014 20:48
Re : Thecotheus?
Les spores sont munies d'apicules un peu tronconiques et sont granuleuses.
On a le choix entre T. homskjoldii (sp 29-38 x 14-18 et T. lundqvistii spores 25-30 x 12,5-14,5 avec une préférence pour le premier
Gilbert
Joop van der Lee,
30-01-2014 15:05
Re : Thecotheus?
Merci beaucoup Gilbert und vielen dank Peter. I keep it as T. Holmskjoldii
Â
Joop