09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
08-06-2026 10:16
Spooren Marco
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
08-06-2026 17:00
François BartholomeeusenGood day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de
07-06-2026 15:10
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco
05-06-2026 11:02
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596691
07-06-2026 12:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici une brève description de ce qui m
07-06-2026 12:43
Steve ClementsBojour. This was a strange find on a stick on my
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
06-06-2026 17:44
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco was on planed wood 3 x 1.5 cm
Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 00:42
Hi againI think this is more interesting.
On a spider, 2,5-3 mm tall, light pink synemmata.
Conidiospores:
(3.48) 3.87 - 4.52 (4.98) x (1.65) 1.89 - 2.20 (2.41) µm
Q = (1.61) 1.86 - 2.30 (2.58) ; N = 46
Me = 4.18 x 2.03 µm ; Qe = 2.07
Thanks in advance
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 07:35
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Miguel.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 09:17
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Nicolas
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 15:08
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Conidiophores can be present on the stem, this is what is shown on the 5th picture.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 22:12
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Ooops, I thought conidiophores were pictures 6-9 ( like in G. pulchra), and picture 5 are ¿? another type of conidiophores, more similar to G. pleiopus ones.