Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-05-2026 12:43

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousPuis je avoir votre aide sur ce que

18-05-2026 10:13

Lieve Deceuninck Lieve Deceuninck

Dear forum members,I identified this as the teleom

17-05-2026 22:09

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je sollicite vos avis pour ce Molli

17-05-2026 19:05

Thomas Flammer

I have found this tiny 200 ym cup shaped apothecia

17-05-2026 16:41

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on an old Rubus stem.Fruitbo

05-04-2026 22:46

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on wood of Ceratonia, Algarve, 3.4.2026.The color

15-05-2026 13:33

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousJe serais très reconnaissante enve

16-03-2011 14:31

roman vargas alberto

Hi. I would like some opinion about this Peziza

14-05-2026 05:36

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I haven't paid much attention to Lachnu

10-05-2026 23:17

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana