08-12-2025 21:04
Mark Stevens"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (
08-12-2025 18:59
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy
16-03-2014 22:00
Ralph Vandiest
Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha
08-12-2025 13:39
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899
05-12-2025 17:33
Bruno Coué
Bonjour, je serais heureux de recueillir votre avi
Little "tongues"
Dragiša Savic,
23-04-2014 11:55
Björn Wergen,
23-04-2014 20:11
Re : Little "tongues"
Hi,
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
Andrew N. Miller,
23-04-2014 21:37
Re : Little "tongues"
Looks like an old Rhytidhysteron to me.
Andy
Andy
Christian Lechat,
23-04-2014 21:43
Re : Little "tongues"
I think it is not a fungus
Chr1stian
Chr1stian
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 08:17
Re : Little "tongues"
Thank you all but I guess I'll have to look for her again.
Alain GARDIENNET,
24-04-2014 13:59
Re : Little "tongues"
Probably a single vertical cut would have give an information. I agree with Andy but we have too much little informations.
What is the substrate ?
Alain
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 14:57
Re : Little "tongues"
The substrate is Fagus sylvatica. They were completely rotten and attached to a tree on one side, so I called them tongues. I've never seen Rhytidhysteron and Hysterographium on photos look same but it is much smaller, I found him (http://www.naturefg.com/pages/b-fungi/hysterographium% 20flexuosum.htm)