04-11-2025 09:07
Josep Torres
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
28-10-2025 19:33
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
Venturiocistella on Vaccinium vitis-idaea stem
Marja Pennanen,
06-08-2014 21:36
these are about 0,5 mm wide.
The spores are about 9-12x2-3 and have 2-4 droplets
The asci are about 40-60x7-9 and paraphyses about 2 micrometers wide.
There are both brown and hyaline setae, which are about 50-60x3-4.
The hairs are brown, septate and about 6 micrometers wide.
I found nothing, that would guite fit.
Marja
Hans-Otto Baral,
06-08-2014 23:10
Re : Venturiocistella on Vaccinium vitis-idaea stem
I do not see brown setae, and the hyaline lanceolate structure I cannot interpret.
What about a Fuscolachnum?
What about a Fuscolachnum?
Marja Pennanen,
07-08-2014 07:58
Re : Venturiocistella on Vaccinium vitis-idaea stem
Dear Zotto,
I tried to find one photo, with setae and hairs. There are some in the lower part of the photo. They are different coloured than the hairs and seems to break more easily than others.
The hyaline ones seems glassy. Maybe I should test Koh.
Marja
I tried to find one photo, with setae and hairs. There are some in the lower part of the photo. They are different coloured than the hairs and seems to break more easily than others.
The hyaline ones seems glassy. Maybe I should test Koh.
Marja
Hans-Otto Baral,
07-08-2014 09:16
Re : Venturiocistella on Vaccinium vitis-idaea stem
It seems to me a riddle. The brown ones in the lower part of the last pic could be anchoring hyphae or even from another fungus?
Marja Pennanen,
07-08-2014 13:26
Re : Venturiocistella on Vaccinium vitis-idaea stem
I studied another.
The first one went upside down.
You must be right. Those lanceolate, hyaline "setae" are second kind of paraphyses.
The brown setae did not appear propely in the second preparate being underside.
By the way, these may be even 0,8 mm wide when open and marginal hairs are about 50-65x5-6.
Nordic macromycetes 1 does not contain any Fuscolachnum species, that would fit and that contains descriptions. which I got from Fuscolachnums.
Marja
PS: I forgot to check, if I got a PDF-article of Fuscolachnums allready...
Age comes with poor memory ;)
I'll look for the PDF now.
Found it and this is definitely not F. labradoricum or anything Haines presented. Must be something else.
The first one went upside down.
You must be right. Those lanceolate, hyaline "setae" are second kind of paraphyses.
The brown setae did not appear propely in the second preparate being underside.
By the way, these may be even 0,8 mm wide when open and marginal hairs are about 50-65x5-6.
Nordic macromycetes 1 does not contain any Fuscolachnum species, that would fit and that contains descriptions. which I got from Fuscolachnums.
Marja
PS: I forgot to check, if I got a PDF-article of Fuscolachnums allready...
Age comes with poor memory ;)
I'll look for the PDF now.
Found it and this is definitely not F. labradoricum or anything Haines presented. Must be something else.