
02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

02-07-2025 17:26
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo

02-07-2025 09:32

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56
Lydia KoelmansPlease can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37
Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57
Ethan CrensonHi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 14:45

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co
Lophiostoma myriocarpum
Chris Yeates,
06-10-2014 20:36

I recently collected a partially-decorticated twig in woodland near a stream. I originally suspected that it might be a Chaetosphaeria, but under the microscope it was clearly not - fissitunicate asci proved that. Many, but by no means all, of the perithecia were somewhat laterally compressed and I considered Lophiostoma. Holm & Holm 1988 (Symb. Bot. Upsal. XXVIII) led me to Lophiostoma myriocarpum; the description fitted well, although the accompanying drawing (from the type collection) was not very convincing.
ASCOFrance came to the rescue in the form of Alain and Zotto:
http://www.ascofrance.com/search_forum/7390
I am pretty certain that my fungus is indeed Lophiostoma myriocarpum (or at the very least the same as Alain's fungus, although his spores are longer), this based on the narrowly fusoid multiguttulate spores 27.6-30.8 x 4.8-5.5µm. These were mostly 5-septate, though some were seen with up to 7 septa (the latter could be seen germinating from the polar cells - see the last photo).
As far as I can tell this taxon has not been recorded for Great Britain & Ireland, although there are two records for Lophiostoma vigheffulense (Pass.) Chesters & A.E. Bell. Holm & Holm suggest the two are conspecific - though the spore dimensions given in Chesters and Bell (Mycol. Pap. 120) are smaller and their drawing shows consistently 3-septate spores, with the comment that these are not constricted at the septa.
As ever comments and suggestions are more than welcome.
Cordialement
Chris