23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
21-03-2026 15:13
Lepista ZacariasHello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu
20-03-2026 16:16
Edvin Johannesen
These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through
19-03-2026 19:34
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
there is some uncertainty with identification of this species.
Large spores of this specimen coincide only with one species in Stomiopeltis (S. betula) though the host differs (Luttrell, 1946; Ellis, 1977). There is a species described from Ledum (S. ledi), but it has much smaller spores (Remler, 1979). It could be possible to consider S. versicolor as well, which also was collected on Rhodod. hirsutum. But it was later transferred to Microthyrium and in "British fungi keys" mentioned with spore appendages. Therefore i inclined to S. betula. Probably you will have other suggestions?
Nina.
Thyriothecia scattered on upper leaf side (fallen leaves of Andromeda polifolia), dark brown, 150-200 mk in diameter, with visible pore.
Scutellum from irregular lobed cells, in some ascocarps (probably later in development) cells to the edge become more elongate and radially arranged; asci 37–44 x 8–10 mk; pseudoparaphyses filiform, about 1.5 mk broad; spores fusoid, with many oils, slightly heteropolar, with one weak septa, some curved, 15 (13–18) x 3.2 (2.5–3.9) mk (n=23, measurements in dead state).
I only know S. betulae on Betula on which it is very common here. My measurements are always towards the top of the range given by Pamela Ellis - see attached image. I think your measurements are too small for S. betulae - perhaps you have an undescribed taxon. Do you have any macro-images?
Cordialement
Chris
thank you for showing me S. betulae. It looks more robust, and yes, spores in my specimen are smaller. I did not make macro-photos because it is barely seen by naked eye, very scattered dots on leaves, better to use lens for them ). I will collect more material of this group to make clear picture later, now will left it under-identified.




