28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
23-05-2026 11:44
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro
25-05-2026 16:44
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,During an excursion organised by
26-05-2026 21:25
Dirk GerstnerHello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li
26-05-2026 22:44
Ethan CrensonHi all, I think I have Incrucipulum capitatum her
22-05-2026 14:44
Lothar Krieglsteiner
in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
22-05-2026 13:29
Gernot FriebesHi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater
23-05-2026 18:57
Sylvie Le GoffBonjour à tousRécolté sur une branchette de Sal
Podospora
Malcolm Greaves,
13-02-2015 01:22
Although the spores were a little big at 48-50 x 25 it seemed the most likely even though it is very rare in the uk.
A couple of days later with more mature specimens the appendages became more obvious and although difficult to capture I am now sure it is P intestinacea. The spores were also larger at 60 x 30.
Mal
Francisco Calaça,
13-02-2015 01:41
Re : Podospora
Hello Malcon,
I was looking in Lundqvist's monograph about P. intestinacea and I agree with you.
I was looking in Lundqvist's monograph about P. intestinacea and I agree with you.
Chris Johnson,
13-02-2015 09:17
Re : Podospora
Hi Mal
This agrees with a collection I made in 2012 and another last week, both on pony dung.
Chris
This agrees with a collection I made in 2012 and another last week, both on pony dung.
Chris
Michel Delpont,
13-02-2015 10:00
Re : Podospora
Hello Malcolm.
No problem, P.intestinacea.
Michel.
No problem, P.intestinacea.
Michel.




