03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
31-08-2025 19:41
Enrique Rubio
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
31-08-2025 17:32
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc
01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr
31-08-2025 14:34
Thomas FlammerI have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus
29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.
Phaeostilbella
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-11-2007 17:50
Bon soiranybody an idea about a Phaeostibella growing on Equisetum hyemale?
Conidia are 10-15 x 2.7-3.6 µm, distinctly wider than indicated by Höhnel (1925: 72) for P. atra (11-14 x 1.8-2.5 µm). P. atra is known on grasses. Höhnel recognizes also a P. rhopaloides, but without any data.
Zotto
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-11-2007 17:51
Re:Phaeostilbella
heads of synnemata
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-11-2007 17:52
Re:Phaeostilbella
conidia
Christian Lechat,
11-11-2007 18:23
Re:Phaeostilbella
Hi Zotto,
Conidia mostly 12-14 x 3-4µm according to Mason & M.B. Ellis, 1953 for Saccardaea atra (Desm.) Mason & M.B. Ellis
Conidia mostly 12-14 x 3-4µm according to Mason & M.B. Ellis, 1953 for Saccardaea atra (Desm.) Mason & M.B. Ellis
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-11-2007 22:09
Re:Phaeostilbella
Hi Christian
thanks, that fits very well. In Species Fungorum
http://norman.sp2000.org/show_species_details.php?record_id=3332617
I see that the genus is placed in the Hypocreales, but apparently without known teleomorph genus.
Zotto
thanks, that fits very well. In Species Fungorum
http://norman.sp2000.org/show_species_details.php?record_id=3332617
I see that the genus is placed in the Hypocreales, but apparently without known teleomorph genus.
Zotto