Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-06-2025 12:09

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 19:05

ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

30-06-2025 16:56

Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

30-06-2025 06:57

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

25-06-2025 16:56

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 17:10

Peter Welt Peter Welt

I'm looking for: RANALLI, M.E., GAMUNDÍ, I.J. 19

28-06-2025 16:00

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

27-06-2025 14:09

Åge Oterhals

I found this pyrenomycetous fungi in mountain area

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Disco on Carex pendula
Chris Yeates, 07-06-2015 19:37
Chris YeatesBonsoir tous
this fungus was collected in good condition on damp dead leaves of Carex pendula. Shortly stiped (up to half disc diameter).
* Pale cream hymenium (no hint of reddening with age - this was collected a week ago).
* Hairs roughened; in the lower part often filled with very distinctive globose VB's
* Asci BB, without croziers; occasionally with one to three "Psilachnum guttules".
* Spores narrowly clavate, with a few small oil droplets; 8.5-10.2 x 1.9-2.2µm.

Any suggestions very welcome
Cordialement
Chris
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
Andreas Gminder, 07-06-2015 19:43
Andreas Gminder
Re : Disco on Carex pendula

Hello Chris,


why is it not Lachnum caricis?


best regards,


Andreas

Chris Yeates, 07-06-2015 20:45
Chris Yeates
Re : Disco on Carex pendula
Hallo Andreas
A species I have not collected before - at the time I was working on it the only descriptions I had (of Dasyscypha/Dasyscyphus caricis) were in Dennis (1949) and Ellis and Ellis I. Spore measurements and shape were not quite right and Cubby was unavailable so I could not check against Zotto's files.
I can see that the Dennis and Ellis descriptions were almost certainly from dried/dead material - hence the discrepancies. Zotto's HB 8563 is a very good match indeed, with all the characters I mentioned shown. The guttules in the paraphyses and (especially) in the proximal part of many of the hairs are very distinctive - I attach a couple more images of the hairs.

Very many thanks for your (very quick) response, Andreas.
  • message #36408
  • message #36408