24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
26-03-2026 15:31
Åke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
25-03-2026 20:53
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
25-03-2026 15:06
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm
Bonjour:Asques x8, croziers+, IKI + BB
Spores 9,50 - 11,80 / 3,00 - 3,90 Q= 2,60 - 3,65
Cordialement
Hi Leandro,
this looks much like M. uda for me. Did you test the KOH-reaction? This should be positive in M. uda.
Regards from Lothar
Paraphyses without reaction KOH 3 %
Best regards
Hello,
so this should be Mollisia rivularis then, but the spore size doesn't fit and also M. rivularis should have a few oil drops inseide the spores.
I also came across collections, which in all respects looked like M. rivularis, but had the spores of M. pulviniformis (= M. uda ss. auct.).
because of these intemediate collections I hesitate to describe the Mollisia pulviniformis as new species, and want to wait on molecular data from more collections, especially from M. rivularis.
I have prepared a paper on the submers species of Mollisia, but it is not ready yet.
best regards,
Andreas