Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-06-2025 16:56

Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 17:10

Peter Welt Peter Welt

I'm looking for: RANALLI, M.E., GAMUNDÍ, I.J. 19

28-06-2025 16:00

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Question on nomenclature
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:01
Hello,
I have a question concerning the author citation in case of a new combination.
Art. 33.2. of the International Code of Botanical Nomeclature (ICBN) says: "A new combination, or an avowed substitute (nomen novum), published on or after 1 January 1953, for a previously and validly published name is not validly published unless its basionym (name-bringing or epithet-bringing syn-onym) or the replaced synonym (when a new name is proposed) is clearly indicated and a full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date."
But what is going to happen with new combinations before 1953?
Let's have a look at an example, which was the concrete reason for my question:
Ciboria coryli was described by Schellenberg the first time as Sclerotinia coryli (1906). In 1943 Buchwald published the new combination Ciboria coryli in an article on Monilinia fructigena. He did it just in a footnote, which does not stand in direct connection to Schellenbergs article of 1906. The footnote says just: "Sclerotinia coryli Schellenb. er i Virkeligheden slet ikke en Sclerotinia-Art, men bør henføres til Ciboria, C. coryli (Schellenb.) comb. nov." That means that there is no "full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date" as the ICBN demands. Is the new combination nevertheless valid because published before 1953? Or do we have to refer to Whetzel (1947), who gives a full reference to Schellenbergs article?
Ciboria coryli (Schell). Buchw. 1943 or (Schell.) Whetz. 1947?
Thanks for every information and greetings from Germany
Thomas
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 09-03-2005 17:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello.
It means that before 1953 (january, 1st) the citation of the basionym isn't mandatory. So the correct citation for Ciboria coryli is Ciboria coryli (Schell.) Buchw.
Regards.
Nicolas
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:43
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello Nicolas,
long question, short answer ... :-)
Thanks a lot for your fast and precise help!!
Greetings
Thomas