Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-04-2025 22:48

Gustaf Fredell Gustaf Fredell

Hello,I hope everything is going well. I couple mo

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

24-04-2025 21:35

Thorben Hülsewig

Hi there,last week i could found this asco on an S

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by J

25-04-2025 09:33

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Ascomata shaped like deformed black grains, measur

24-04-2025 21:53

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... 15.7.24 in the Alps. There were many asci with

23-04-2025 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good afternoon Looking for Octospores / Lamprospo

24-04-2025 15:03

Henri Koskinen

Hello, I collected this Lasiobolus 22.04. near Hel

23-04-2025 19:58

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this interesting Orbilia sp. one year ago

22-04-2025 10:37

François Bartholomeeusen

Also found on April 18, 2025 on an old seed-pod of

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Question on nomenclature
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:01
Hello,
I have a question concerning the author citation in case of a new combination.
Art. 33.2. of the International Code of Botanical Nomeclature (ICBN) says: "A new combination, or an avowed substitute (nomen novum), published on or after 1 January 1953, for a previously and validly published name is not validly published unless its basionym (name-bringing or epithet-bringing syn-onym) or the replaced synonym (when a new name is proposed) is clearly indicated and a full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date."
But what is going to happen with new combinations before 1953?
Let's have a look at an example, which was the concrete reason for my question:
Ciboria coryli was described by Schellenberg the first time as Sclerotinia coryli (1906). In 1943 Buchwald published the new combination Ciboria coryli in an article on Monilinia fructigena. He did it just in a footnote, which does not stand in direct connection to Schellenbergs article of 1906. The footnote says just: "Sclerotinia coryli Schellenb. er i Virkeligheden slet ikke en Sclerotinia-Art, men bør henføres til Ciboria, C. coryli (Schellenb.) comb. nov." That means that there is no "full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date" as the ICBN demands. Is the new combination nevertheless valid because published before 1953? Or do we have to refer to Whetzel (1947), who gives a full reference to Schellenbergs article?
Ciboria coryli (Schell). Buchw. 1943 or (Schell.) Whetz. 1947?
Thanks for every information and greetings from Germany
Thomas
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 09-03-2005 17:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello.
It means that before 1953 (january, 1st) the citation of the basionym isn't mandatory. So the correct citation for Ciboria coryli is Ciboria coryli (Schell.) Buchw.
Regards.
Nicolas
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:43
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello Nicolas,
long question, short answer ... :-)
Thanks a lot for your fast and precise help!!
Greetings
Thomas