Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-07-2025 23:03

Help with some conidia.
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

17-07-2025 11:55

Una para ID 833
Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en bosque de hayas y abetos, en tieraEjemp

16-07-2025 17:34

Sphaerulina cornicola versus Septoria cornina
Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Une hélotiale sur Sphagnum palustre
Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de  (?) Hyaloscyphace

15-07-2025 13:27

literature request
Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

Hello, does anyone have access to the following ar

16-01-2023 21:31

Troposporella fumosum => Troposporella monilipes
Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55

Hypoxylon cf ticinense
Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17

Jackrogersella minutella VS Hypoxylon cohaerens var. microsporum
Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52

Olla aff. millepunctata (croziers +) on Rubus idaeus
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37

Rutstroemia ulmariae(?) on Saxifraga rotundifolia
Gernot Friebes

Hi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Coprotus?
Malcolm Greaves, 22-09-2015 21:15
Malcolm GreavesA cluster of these quite small fungi on dung(max 0.6mm) Although there were no hairs round the edge the seemed to be one or two hairs from the middle of some of the Apothecia. Oval,smooth spores c22.5-25.5 x 14.2-14.6. I thought Coprotus was the closest but I am not convinced.
Thanks
Mal
  • message #38042
  • message #38042
  • message #38042
Peter Püwert, 22-09-2015 21:34
Peter Püwert
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Malcolm,
in my opinion is that no Coprotus. However, I can give at the moment also no other recommendation.
Greetings Peter.
With the type Coprotus the paraphyses are very important for determination.
Hans-Otto Baral, 22-09-2015 21:43
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Coprotus?
My impression is that of a Pseudombrophila, but I may be wrong.

Zotto
Michel Delpont, 23-09-2015 09:27
Michel Delpont
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Mal.

Yes, your fungus is not necessarily Coprotus, but lacks details to continue; did you do the reaction to Melzer to check?

Michel.
Malcolm Greaves, 23-09-2015 10:38
Malcolm Greaves
Re : Coprotus?
Thanks.
No reaction to Meltzers. Is there anything else I could look for?
Mal
  • message #38049
Uwe Lindemann, 23-09-2015 12:04
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Coprotus?
In my impression, it could be also Iodophanus carneus.
Best, Uwe
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 23-09-2015 12:09
Lothar Krieglsteiner
no Iodophanus

Hi Uwe,


Mal wrote that there was no reaction with Melzers reagent. Furthermore, the spores appear to be fully smooth.


Best regards from Lothar

Uwe Lindemann, 23-09-2015 12:15
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Coprotus?
OK.
Es war nur eine Idee. Wegen des Paraphysen- und des Sporeninhalts.
Ja, richtig, der Ascus bei Iodophanus ist jod-positiv und die Sporen fein-warzig.
Sorry for my wrong path...
Viele Grüße
Uwe
Hans-Otto Baral, 23-09-2015 13:06
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Coprotus?
Malcolm's last photo was in Melzer's, so the characteristic paraphysis content of Iodophanus would be destroyed. I don't know a clear character of Pseudombrophila, but the macroscopy reminds me of that genus.
Zotto
Uwe Lindemann, 23-09-2015 14:56
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Coprotus?
Shows last photo of Mal the reaction in Melzer? Sorry for my further asking.
Best, Uwe
Malcolm Greaves, 23-09-2015 21:44
Malcolm Greaves
Re : Coprotus?
Uwe
Yes the last photo was in meltzers
Mal