15-10-2025 16:39
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
03-10-2025 13:44
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus
13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,
11-10-2025 20:27
Marcel Heyligen
Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro
09-10-2025 22:14
S. RebeccaWe just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au
10-10-2025 00:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw
Coprotus?
Malcolm Greaves,
22-09-2015 21:15
A cluster of these quite small fungi on dung(max 0.6mm) Although there were no hairs round the edge the seemed to be one or two hairs from the middle of some of the Apothecia. Oval,smooth spores c22.5-25.5 x 14.2-14.6. I thought Coprotus was the closest but I am not convinced.Thanks
Mal
Peter Püwert,
22-09-2015 21:34
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Malcolm,
in my opinion is that no Coprotus. However, I can give at the moment also no other recommendation.
Greetings Peter.
With the type Coprotus the paraphyses are very important for determination.
in my opinion is that no Coprotus. However, I can give at the moment also no other recommendation.
Greetings Peter.
With the type Coprotus the paraphyses are very important for determination.
Hans-Otto Baral,
22-09-2015 21:43
Re : Coprotus?
My impression is that of a Pseudombrophila, but I may be wrong.
Zotto
Zotto
Michel Delpont,
23-09-2015 09:27
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Mal.
Yes, your fungus is not necessarily Coprotus, but lacks details to continue; did you do the reaction to Melzer to check?
Michel.
Yes, your fungus is not necessarily Coprotus, but lacks details to continue; did you do the reaction to Melzer to check?
Michel.
Malcolm Greaves,
23-09-2015 10:38
Re : Coprotus?
Thanks.
No reaction to Meltzers. Is there anything else I could look for?
Mal
No reaction to Meltzers. Is there anything else I could look for?
Mal
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 12:04
Re : Coprotus?
In my impression, it could be also Iodophanus carneus.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
23-09-2015 12:09
no Iodophanus
Hi Uwe,
Mal wrote that there was no reaction with Melzers reagent. Furthermore, the spores appear to be fully smooth.
Best regards from Lothar
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 12:15
Re : Coprotus?
OK.
Es war nur eine Idee. Wegen des Paraphysen- und des Sporeninhalts.
Ja, richtig, der Ascus bei Iodophanus ist jod-positiv und die Sporen fein-warzig.
Sorry for my wrong path...
Viele Grüße
Uwe
Es war nur eine Idee. Wegen des Paraphysen- und des Sporeninhalts.
Ja, richtig, der Ascus bei Iodophanus ist jod-positiv und die Sporen fein-warzig.
Sorry for my wrong path...
Viele Grüße
Uwe
Hans-Otto Baral,
23-09-2015 13:06
Re : Coprotus?
Malcolm's last photo was in Melzer's, so the characteristic paraphysis content of Iodophanus would be destroyed. I don't know a clear character of Pseudombrophila, but the macroscopy reminds me of that genus.
Zotto
Zotto
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 14:56
Re : Coprotus?
Shows last photo of Mal the reaction in Melzer? Sorry for my further asking.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Malcolm Greaves,
23-09-2015 21:44
Re : Coprotus?
Uwe
Yes the last photo was in meltzers
Mal
Yes the last photo was in meltzers
Mal