09-01-2026 17:41
Arnold BüschlenHallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
07-01-2026 22:22
Danny Newman
Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm
10-01-2026 01:18
Danny Newman
cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre
07-01-2026 10:24
Danny Newman
Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl
09-01-2026 10:08
Blasco Rafael
Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia
08-01-2026 21:22
Blasco Rafael
Hola, He recogido esta muestra de Orbilia sobre Re
07-01-2026 17:29
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal
10-11-2021 17:33
Riet van Oosten
Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059
07-01-2026 10:05
Danny Newman
cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea
I am trying to find out why one of the British fungal databases (FRDBI) has changed Scutellina cejpii to Micoscypha cejpii. It quotes Ceská Mykol. 39(4): 207 (1985) whereas S cejpii has Ceská Mykol. 25(2): 83 (1971 ). Does anyone have a copy of this publication in PDF?Thanks
Mal
all issues of Czech Mycology can be downloaded here:
http://www.czechmycology.org/czech-mycology-content.php#v39
In the article from 1985, Microscypha cejpii is presented as a new combination for Hyaloscypha cejpii.
Best regards, Zuzana
Thanks again.
Mal
I sent a message to the MB managers.
Mal
see T. Schumacher (1988): The Scutellinia Battle; The Lost, Missing and Dead. Mycotaxon 33, relevant pages here: http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cyberliber/59575/0033/0165.htm
In short, S. hirta in original (C.F.Schumacher's and Fries's) sense is probably a Geopora, deeply cupulate species with fasciculate hairs. Then there's S. hirta ss. Cooke and Le Gal, the latter selected a neotype and, based on her description, this taxon seems conspecific with S. cejpii. T.Schumacher considered S. hirta (ss. anyone) nomen ambiguum.
T.Schumacher didn't in either work (1979, 1988, 1990) cite the neotype in K among studied specimens. Yao and Spooner (1996, Notes on British species of Scutellinia. Mycol. Res. 100) studied the Cooke's collection in K (S. hirta neotype) and confirmed it's conspecificity with S. hirta ss. Le Gal. They also pointed out that C.F.Schumacher wrote orange-red hymenium for this species ("miniata [,] extus fusco hirta") and that therefore it cannot be a Geopora.
But interesting is, that although Fries (1822) wrote this species has color like Peziza (Caloscypha) fulgens and that C.F.Schumacher illustrated immature specimen (which Fries compares with Peziza (Trichophaea) hybrida, quite correctly for an immature Scutellinia), he also states that C.F.Schumacher's fungus is 3 lignes wide and high. If he used milimeters, it would look ok, but "3 lin." should be equal to 6,75 mm. If anyone has an explanation for this, I would very much like to learn it. Anyway, I wonder if it is at all possible to confirm conspecificity of S. hirta ss. Cooke with S. hirta ss. orig. + Fries's, when neither was illustrated and there is no orig. material available.
Viktorie
Schumacher: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/252660#page/430/mode/1up
Fries: http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=958