Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-11-2009 22:22

Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Bonne nuit, Voir si vous m'avez élaguée appor

07-12-2015 14:17

Zugna Marino Zugna Marino

Buon giorno a tutti, ad un primo momento, non ess

25-11-2012 20:32

Bometon Javier Bometon Javier

Ascomas cupoliformes abiertos lateralmente, himeni

25-01-2026 16:08

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eutypa or Diatrype sp on Salix
Watt John, 05-09-2017 12:27
Whilst on recording foray with Northwest Fungus Group near river Mersey in damp woodlands, I found a pyrenomycete growing on the bark of attached dead Salix branch.  The sulcate ostioles have the cross feature of Diatrypaceae; without green-yellow fluid on section( E. flavovirens), and no colour reaction with KOH. Asci are 8 spored without blue reaction around apparatus from Lugol's and the a.spores are mostly around 6 x 1 -15.mc, pale. I could see plenty of fine simple paraphyses which seemed to rule out sp such as Eutypa maura. I repeated the squash with Cotton Blue and this time some perithicia seemed to be without paraphyses though they were evident elsewhere on slide.  
Some texts disagree on presence of paraphyses in some of these species.
I had a look at the Salix associated species on this website but didn't seem to be one of those.  
Not even quite sure whether it be Eutypa or Diatrype though it does look like Diatrype bullata, but for the paraphyses. 

I do understand there is some fluidity amongst the taxonomy of this group. 

John Watt
Ormskirk,
England


  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274