Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-05-2026 21:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

20-05-2026 20:08

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,another quite distinctive find from M

20-05-2026 12:57

Ingo Ibelshäuser Ingo Ibelshäuser

Hello everybody, on decayed hardwood e.g. Quercus

20-05-2026 17:47

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

20-05-2026 18:15

Moreno Miriam

Hello! I am working on my master's thesis on the d

22-04-2026 20:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.This Pyrenopeziza grew in moist le

17-05-2026 22:09

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je sollicite vos avis pour ce Molli

19-05-2026 19:47

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello dear community,found this species the second

19-05-2026 12:55

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

After checking Gminder and Otto's library I cannot

19-05-2026 10:27

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte récente sur terre retournée i

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eutypa or Diatrype sp on Salix
Watt John, 05-09-2017 12:27
Whilst on recording foray with Northwest Fungus Group near river Mersey in damp woodlands, I found a pyrenomycete growing on the bark of attached dead Salix branch.  The sulcate ostioles have the cross feature of Diatrypaceae; without green-yellow fluid on section( E. flavovirens), and no colour reaction with KOH. Asci are 8 spored without blue reaction around apparatus from Lugol's and the a.spores are mostly around 6 x 1 -15.mc, pale. I could see plenty of fine simple paraphyses which seemed to rule out sp such as Eutypa maura. I repeated the squash with Cotton Blue and this time some perithicia seemed to be without paraphyses though they were evident elsewhere on slide.  
Some texts disagree on presence of paraphyses in some of these species.
I had a look at the Salix associated species on this website but didn't seem to be one of those.  
Not even quite sure whether it be Eutypa or Diatrype though it does look like Diatrype bullata, but for the paraphyses. 

I do understand there is some fluidity amongst the taxonomy of this group. 

John Watt
Ormskirk,
England


  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274