
03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

07-09-2025 11:34

Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

05-09-2025 09:32

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

05-09-2025 18:53

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
Another Lachnum for identification
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 14:36
Cup diameter: max 1 mm.
Stipe height: 0.5-1.0 mm.
Spores: 6.5-9.5 x 1.4-2.4 µm.
Paraphyses: sometimes with a swollen part and protruding the asci by 20 -25 µm. Width: 3.0-7.5 µm.
Hairs: with septa and a maximum length of 60 µm.
Crouziers: I would guess yes.
What Lachnum species could this be?
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 14:44

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Croziers are cleary visible on your beforelast photo. I guess again L. pubescens. L. subvirgineum has longer, more capitate hairs
Zotto
Zotto
Jan Knuiman,
30-06-2018 15:14
Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Thanks Zotto for your quick reply!
Jan
Jan
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-06-2018 16:20

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
I have a folder "pubescens cf., salicis, Salix" on my homepage which includes samples on Salix (but the type of L. pubescens was also on Salix and might be the same).
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Salix and Populus are not easy to distinguish from the wood anatomy, but Betula is quite different.
Hans-Otto Baral,
05-03-2025 21:16

Re : Another Lachnum for identification
Dear Jan
I would like to upload your two sequences for an article on Lachnum in Boletus. Did you receive my mail?
As for LP1 I guess the branch is about 10 mm thick, not 3 mm as I have noted.
The collection data are complete, but I need the institute where Jorinde Nuytinck works.
It should be the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden.
I think I will write her too.
Zotto