18-07-2025 23:03
Josep Torres
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Hypoxylon multiforme?
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 07:22
Spores 10,2-11,6*4,2-5,2 ìm, Q=2,2-2,6
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 07:32
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Spores foto
Christian Lechat,
19-09-2008 08:33
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Difficult to say with so few elements, but it looks like H. cohaerens.
Regards,
Regards,
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 08:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Vasileios,
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 08:52
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Thank you very much for your correspondence
Andrew N. Miller,
19-09-2008 18:08
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
I believe both H. multiforme and H. cohaerens (along with H. truncatum and H. annulatum) have all been transferred to the new genus, Annulohypoxylon by Y.-M. Ju, J.D. Rogers & H.-
M. Hsieh.
Andy
M. Hsieh.
Andy
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 18:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Andy,
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques