14-07-2011 20:53
Alex Akulov
Some photos of specimen are presented below Alex
23-08-2011 22:10
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I found very nice species - Bion
23-08-2011 10:20
Peter Welt
I am looking for a magazine article where the foll
21-08-2011 11:33
Joseph PellicaniPezize récoltée sur terre nue sous FagusRéac J+
15-08-2011 22:30
Martin Bemmann
Hi all,Peziza is not my territory but I couldn't r
21-08-2011 16:05
Stip Helleman
Chèrs Amis,I would appreciate your opinion on thi
19-08-2011 09:29
Alex Akulov
Dear Friends Today I had the opportunity to see a
Hypoxylon multiforme?
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 07:22
Spores 10,2-11,6*4,2-5,2 ìm, Q=2,2-2,6
Christian Lechat,
19-09-2008 08:33
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Difficult to say with so few elements, but it looks like H. cohaerens.
Regards,
Regards,
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 08:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Vasileios,
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
H. cohaerens is specific for Fagus. Otherwise its main difference with H multiforme is the germ slit length on ascospores: short in multiforme, spore-length in cohaerens, best seen in KOH.
You can visit http://pyrenomycetes.free.fr/ for more informations.
Best wishes,
Jacques
VASILEIOS KAOUNAS,
19-09-2008 08:52
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Thank you very much for your correspondence
Andrew N. Miller,
19-09-2008 18:08
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
I believe both H. multiforme and H. cohaerens (along with H. truncatum and H. annulatum) have all been transferred to the new genus, Annulohypoxylon by Y.-M. Ju, J.D. Rogers & H.-
M. Hsieh.
Andy
M. Hsieh.
Andy
Jacques Fournier,
19-09-2008 18:48
Re:Hypoxylon multiforme?
Hi Andy,
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques
you are perfectly right as to the new name Annulohypoxylon but I told Vasileios to visit my website, which has not been updated since this change....names change but fortunately fungi do not much ..
Jacques

