27-03-2026 15:08
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this coelomycete on C
26-03-2026 15:31
Ã…ke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
27-03-2026 10:47
Ã…ge OterhalsI have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Ã…ge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
25-03-2026 20:53
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever
Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
22-03-2020 22:03
https://www.bio-forum.pl/messages/33/1102700.html
Jacques Fournier,
25-03-2020 18:02
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Hello,
I was hoping that Thomas would answer because he revised the type specimen of X. guepini and created X. friesii.
In the meantime, based on your data and Laessoe's 1993 paper, I think your collection fits well X. guepini in all respects.
It is a poorly known species, rarely collected at sexual state, thus you collection is of great interest.
Thanks for sharing it.
Cheers,
Jacques
Thomas Læssøe,
26-03-2020 10:19
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Just back from Cuba (birding) to a closed university etc. I would agree with Jacques that X. guepinii is the best match (super material), but I have not studied this complex for decennia so feel a bit rusty. It is still a possibility that both scotica and my own friesii should be lumped with guepinii.
bw
Thomas
bw
Thomas
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
26-03-2020 13:47
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
I would like to thank both excellent interlocutors for their contributions. I am very happy.
Have a nice day - Przemek
Have a nice day - Przemek
Przemyslaw Drzewiecki,
17-12-2023 21:59
Re : Xylaria guepinii\ friesii?
Hallo all,
I read a new article about this species: Hsieh H-M, Ju Y-M, Lechat C, Fournier J, Huart D. New ecological, morphological, cultural and molecular phylogenetic insights into Xylaria guepini (Xylariaceae) Ascomycete.org. 2022;14:177–184.
I very much regret that the authors lacked scientific inquisitiveness and did not ask me for part of my collection for comparative analysis. :-( Especially since, when comparing the morphology of both collections, due to significant differences, especially (though not only) in the aspect of conidiogeny, it should be assumed that they are different species of the Xylaria genus.
I am fully willing to cooperate in further research on this species (unfortunately I do not have the ability to conduct genetic research myself),
best regards, Przemek
I read a new article about this species: Hsieh H-M, Ju Y-M, Lechat C, Fournier J, Huart D. New ecological, morphological, cultural and molecular phylogenetic insights into Xylaria guepini (Xylariaceae) Ascomycete.org. 2022;14:177–184.
I very much regret that the authors lacked scientific inquisitiveness and did not ask me for part of my collection for comparative analysis. :-( Especially since, when comparing the morphology of both collections, due to significant differences, especially (though not only) in the aspect of conidiogeny, it should be assumed that they are different species of the Xylaria genus.
I am fully willing to cooperate in further research on this species (unfortunately I do not have the ability to conduct genetic research myself),
best regards, Przemek
