Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

05-12-2025 17:33

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour, je serais heureux de recueillir votre avi

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia sp.
Perz Piotr, 23-02-2006 12:14
Salve!

I have found this Rutstroemia on [unidetified] petiole: http://wwkk.mikologia.pl/spec/20051015_001_PERZ/20051015_001_PERZ.php

What is strange? Strange is H2O+IKI reaction on..... I do not know where :) It seems to be LB's in paraphyses reaction, or interhymenial gel (A.Gminder) ?? Something is here amyloid!
Rutstroemia sydowiana HAS NOT this reaction (H2O+IKI), may be Rutstroemia petiolorum, but i do not have this spec. in my herbarium and i can not test this reaction.

What do you think - is this a contaminant in hymenium or this taxon does have amyloid LB's in paraphyses OR interhymenial gel ?

Has anyone R.petiolorum and can make test for me? Or may be do you know this spec.?

Best,
Pimpek
Hans-Otto Baral, 23-03-2006 18:26
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Rutstroemia sp.
The Rutstroemia is very interesting, I think it is conspecific with R. "kalevi" on the DVD. This name is unpublished, it was intended to be published by J.T. Palmer and myself long ago. The substrate looks for me as an Acer petiole, and that´s also the substrate of the two earlier finds.

I found the ectal excipulum to be heavily gelatinized! No t. prismatica but strong oblita, see below. But it´s interesting: the find made by Lothar Krieglsteiner I saw fresh and I saw only scarcely any gel in the (living) excipulum, whereas in the find from Estonia the excipulum is heavily gelatinized. You write you have only one fruitbody, but I see two on your drawing. Do you still have one? Please have another look at the excipulum.

The species is surely close to R. coracina, but that is on Quercus leaves in the mediterranean area and has broader spores and brown vacuoles in the living paraphyses. Typical for both is the brown crenulate margin.

What I´m surprized from your drawing are the multiguttulate paraphyses. Such guttulation is very very typical of R. luteovirescens (which also grows on stromatized Acer leaves). But that species has yelow apothecia and really a textura prismatica without gel! R. kalevi has Mollisia-like vacuoles in the paraphyses. I presume that the guttules you saw in the dead material are secondary, maybe induced by the iodine. By the way I saw only the apical rings to react blue in IKI, and I am sure that you saw the blue rings of the old emptied and collapsed asci among the paraphyses and were misled to believe that the latter were amyloid.

  • message #681