Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-04-2024 18:32

Anna Klos

Good evening,I found this Ascobolus on wet soil an

18-04-2024 18:52

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, J'ai beoin d'éclairage(s) pour ce Daldi

19-04-2024 14:28

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

Cudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit

13-04-2024 11:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, April 2024

16-04-2024 17:43

Giovanni ANTOLA Giovanni ANTOLA

Bonjour,Trouvé sous paille humide, autour d'un je

14-04-2024 20:04

Manak Roman

Hi all,I have two very similar finding last weeken

17-04-2024 10:44

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Juste à côté du cône avec "Hyphodiscus ayelii"

16-04-2024 22:53

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

14-04-2024 22:58

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

• Bactridium flavum (anamorph): Distinctive macr

15-04-2024 14:37

Eric Rousseau

Bonjour,Je sais que les cyphelles ne sont pas des

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hymenoscyphus sp.
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 07:52
Hi
Last Sunday I found this Hymeoscyphus growing on leaves lying on the muddy ground. multi-species forest, including Populus. Due to time constraints, I only took a few photos. The spores didn't want to release from the ascus so I put the collection in the ripening room. Unfortunately, I moistened too little and the ascomata gently dried up. Further breeding attempts did not give adequate results. However, looking at the photos taken just after the harvest, I came to the conclusion that it may be quite an interesting species. Similar to H. imberbias but certainly not.
The content of paraffins is very weakly refracting light and tends to blend together. Ascus much longer than that of H. Imberbis. A few measured slightly exceeded 100 µm.
The only similar one that I could find in the literature is Phaeohelotium binucleatum. The problem is, I didn't capture the nucleic droplets in the photos. Some spores show something similar to them, but I'm not sure if it's them?

Anyway, I am posting photos hoping for your opinion.

Spores:

(9.5) 10.2 - 11.2 (12.2) × (3.7) 3.8 - 4.1 (4.3) µm
Q = (2.4) 2.7 - 2.8 ; N = 6
Me = 10.9 × 4 µm ; Qe = 2.7

  9.53 4.03
10.78 3.79
12.23 4.32
10.25 3.70
11.25 3.99
11.08 4.14

greetings
Mirek
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 14-10-2020 08:15
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hello Mirek,
without fully comparing the measurements (no time), I see some similiarities with Hymenoscyphus immutabilis.
Best, Lothar
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 08:36
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Lothar
I didn't know this genre but it seems it will be this genre.
Many thanks
Mirek
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-10-2020 10:20
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
I agree. The apos are probably over 1 mm? H. immutabilis is comparatively large. The paraphysis content is perfect, not at all as refractive as in imberbis. But with IKI it causes a strong red reaction with extruding minute granules.
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 10:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Zotto
The Ascomats were quite small, about 1mm, probably because, as I said, the fruiting bodies were not yet mature enough.
The contents of the paraphyses, exactly as you say :)
Thank you
Mirek