
02-03-2021 21:29

Hello,Found today (02-03-2021) on Typha spec.Is Ar

02-03-2021 16:01
Garcia SusanaHola, He encontrado estos peritecios y me gustarÃ

02-03-2021 14:52
Me mandan el material seco de Galicia, recolecta

25-02-2021 17:28

Bonjour à tous,Un étudiant en Master 2 du CEFE d

01-03-2021 17:01
Menno BoomsluiterI was wondering, if any, what the status of Xylari

28-02-2021 20:18
Stefan BlaserHello everybody, I am not getting on with the fol

01-03-2021 18:33

Hola, He encontrado estas muestras sobre Juglans

01-03-2021 17:21
Hi againI have found small, rounded, gregarious, n

01-03-2021 11:28
Mirek GrycHello everyone.The only thing I can say about it i
Again with a specimen of Helvella, which I believe as much in common with Helvella atra, mainly the stem. The cap however is a bit distinct from what I'm used to observe, not only because of the three saddles, but also because of the colour and texture. Is there any other species with these features?
Thanks in advance,
zaca
(17.9) 18.6 - 21.07 (21.1) × (11.1) 11.2 - 13.6 (13.7) µm
Q = (1.5) 1.52 - 1.7 ; N = 20
Me = 19.8 × 12.3 µm ; Qe = 1.6

try any key to this genus, for example:Â https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832953/
Regards,
Marek
thanks for your suggestion and link.
However, I have a problem while trying to appy the key, as follows:
I think that is easy to reach the point 54 of the key; For clearliness I repeat the steps below. After that there are only a few taxa remaining:
H. bicolor, H. fistulosa, H. levis, H. monachella,
none of which can be selected as direct application of the key, in my opinion. The one which "seems" closer (looking at photos available in the internet) is H. monachella, but the spores of are much bigger than those of my specimen. So, what to do?
Can anyone help?
Thanks, zaca
Evolution in the key:
1. Apothecium with a ± prominent distinct stipe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Stipe terete, even, internally solid or hollow, occasionally with
grooves at base and/or apex, tissues well differentiated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
30. Apothecium convex, bi- to trilobate saddle-shaped, or irregularly lobed. . . . 43
43. Cap saddle-shaped or irregularly lobed with a ± deflexed margin. . . . . . . . . 50
50. Receptacle surface glabrous. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

Regards,
zaca
for giving me your opinion.
Looking back to the starting point, from the title of the topic, that was my understanding, but then I decided to question to get more confidence and this now happen.
Regards from Portugal,
zaca
for increasing the percentage level of confidence. That's always nice to hearing from you and seeing some of your inexhaustible stock of beautiful photos.
Kind regards,
zaca
P.S.: Maybe, I became confused by the trilobed cap.
Quote:
"Apothecia stipitate-capitate, saddle-shaped or irregularly lobed,
1–4 cm broad, 3–12 cm high, cap margin adnate and attached
to stipe at 3–4 points; hymenium and stipe blackish with a dark
violet brown tinge (10-12F-H7-8), even or wrinkled; receptacle
surface greyish brown to black, smooth, with inconspicuous
ribs on outer surface; stipe 0.5–2.5 cm broad, naked, with 4–7
sharp-edged, partly double-edged ribs, attached at 3–4 points
to the reflexed apothecial margin greyish brown to black, paler
towards base, ribs prominent, sharp, partly anastomosing and
double-edged, with 'holes' (lacunae) between ribs, stipe chambered
inside. "
Mirek