18-07-2025 23:03
Josep Torres
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Lachnum subvirgineum
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
11-03-2009 00:00
Buenas nochesTengo varias recolecciones de Lachnum virgineum (http://www.micobotanicajaen.com/Revista/Articulos/Fichas/Fichas008/LachnumVirgineum.htm), pero en esta ocasión la microscopía es algo distinta, sobre todo en cuanto a las puntas de los pelos, que son bastante engrosados, y he pensado que podría tratarse de Lachnum subvirgineum. Recolectado en Tenerife (Islas Canarias) en bosque "Monteverde": laurel (Laurus novocanariensis)y brezo (Erica arborea). Ver pdf adjunto.
Gracias,
____________________________________________
Good night
I have several records of Lachnum virgineum (http://www.micobotanicajaen.com/Revista/Articulos/Fichas/Fichas008/LachnumVirgineum.htm), but this one has a little different microscopial characters, because it has a clavate tips hairs. I think it could be Lachnum subvirgineum. Record from Tenerife (Canary Islands), in "Monteverde" forest: laurel (Laurus novocanariensis) and brezo (Erica arborea). See attached pdf file.
Thank you,
7043.pdf
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-03-2009 23:25
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Miguel
yes, I believe this is L. subvirgineum. Why do you write that croziers are also absent? I see very well the croziers in most of your images. The hairs are also shorter in L: subvirgineum compared to L. virgineum. Do you have no possibility to study your specimens when fresh? The micros are all in dead state, and therefore you loose the VBs which are characteristic of quite a lot of Lachnum species.
Zotto
yes, I believe this is L. subvirgineum. Why do you write that croziers are also absent? I see very well the croziers in most of your images. The hairs are also shorter in L: subvirgineum compared to L. virgineum. Do you have no possibility to study your specimens when fresh? The micros are all in dead state, and therefore you loose the VBs which are characteristic of quite a lot of Lachnum species.
Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
12-03-2009 14:33
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Zotto, thank you very much.
Sorry, but, where have you read that "croziers are also absent"? At the second photo in the attached pdf I say "with croziers (right)". I can't find that text.
I used to stay at Tenerife during a week-nine days in June and another week-nine days in December, and I try to come back with a lot of fresh material, but the first days material is difficult to mantein in good condition. Another times I bring the funghi in fresh conditions but I have no time to process all of fresh material, like this L. subvirgineum, because I though it would be L. virgineum again, so perhaps I took more attention to other species before this. Sorry.
Thank you again
Sorry, but, where have you read that "croziers are also absent"? At the second photo in the attached pdf I say "with croziers (right)". I can't find that text.
I used to stay at Tenerife during a week-nine days in June and another week-nine days in December, and I try to come back with a lot of fresh material, but the first days material is difficult to mantein in good condition. Another times I bring the funghi in fresh conditions but I have no time to process all of fresh material, like this L. subvirgineum, because I though it would be L. virgineum again, so perhaps I took more attention to other species before this. Sorry.
Thank you again
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-03-2009 18:34
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Miguel
sorry, I must have been overworked yesterday. Now everything is o.k. :-)
I understand of course the problem with fresh specimens from far away. When I see the fresh macro I think why is the micro so dead. But now I see there are some weeks between. My collections from Tenerife from about 1978 are largely still unexamined :-(
Zotto
sorry, I must have been overworked yesterday. Now everything is o.k. :-)
I understand of course the problem with fresh specimens from far away. When I see the fresh macro I think why is the micro so dead. But now I see there are some weeks between. My collections from Tenerife from about 1978 are largely still unexamined :-(
Zotto