Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk