
05-09-2025 18:53

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

05-09-2025 09:32

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi

03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

31-08-2025 19:41
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

31-08-2025 17:32

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk