Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

16-07-2012 10:38

René Dougoud

Chers Collègues, Une récolte d'une espèce du g

21-07-2012 14:09

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody:Yesterday we have seen this lentic

22-07-2012 11:50

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hi,can anyone help me with following paper:Krug (1

23-07-2012 22:37

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

Hello,Has someone the following article for me:Ra

21-07-2012 23:04

Gernot Friebes

Hi,we are looking for help with this quite conspic

20-07-2012 14:03

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I'm looking for the description of Encoelia gla

19-07-2012 16:46

Chris Yeates Chris Yeates

I struggled for a long time with this before "the

19-07-2012 08:21

Zoltan Lukacs Zoltan Lukacs

Chers Amis,Diam: 1-2 mm, sur sol (peut-être des m

18-07-2012 19:39

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everibodyWe have collected on previous years

17-07-2012 15:05

Christian Lechat Christian Lechat

Dear friends,I would need of a key to the species

« < 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk