Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-09-2025 18:53

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

05-09-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

03-09-2025 21:59

Philippe PELLICIER

La Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

04-09-2025 20:11

Åge Oterhals

Saccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi

03-09-2025 12:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

02-09-2025 10:28

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en madera muy podrida de haya (Fagus)A ver

31-08-2025 19:41

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

31-08-2025 17:32

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

01-09-2025 08:42

François Corhay

Un ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk