14-11-2025 16:26
Marian Jagers
Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius
17-11-2025 21:46
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour,Récolté sur bois pourrissant de feuillu
20-11-2025 14:14
Mick PeerdemanFound on the leaves of 'Juglans regia' in the Neth
20-11-2025 13:07
Mick PeerdemanIn January i found these black markings on the dea
20-11-2025 12:38
Mick PeerdemanDear all,Last week i stumbled upon a leaf of ilex
19-11-2025 23:21
carl van den broeck
Dear guestIn Waardamme, Belgium, I found dozens of
19-11-2025 20:51
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,found this species on a felled trunk
19-11-2025 13:04
Bruno Coué
Bonjour,je sollicite votre avis pour la récote
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk