12-06-2026 14:50
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la brève description d'une Mollis
10-06-2026 21:16
François Freléchoux
Bonsoir,Le dernier du jour, en attendant votre avi
11-06-2026 19:01
William Slosse
Hello all,In an attempt to make a culture of a sus
11-06-2026 19:03
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Chers membres d'Ascofrance,Le site sera placé en
10-06-2026 23:08
éric ROMERO
Bonjour tous, Je vous propose un Mollisia trouvé
09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
10-06-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl
10-06-2026 21:07
François Freléchoux
Toutes les tiges de gentianes jaunes de l'an passÃ
10-06-2026 13:41
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk