Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-11-2025 08:40

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou

28-11-2025 16:45

Nogueira Héctor

November 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI

25-11-2025 14:24

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522

17-09-2025 10:50

Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

27-11-2025 15:41

Thomas Læssøe

Spores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;

27-11-2025 12:01

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727

27-11-2025 11:46

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918

27-11-2025 11:31

Thomas Læssøe

Collectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

26-11-2025 18:13

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk