Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

17-02-2026 13:41

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir

16-02-2026 18:34

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

16-02-2026 17:14

Joanne Taylor

Last week we published the following paper where w

16-02-2026 16:53

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un

16-02-2026 00:05

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good evening, I am looking for the following pape

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk