Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

24-02-2026 00:21

Benoît Segerer

Hello,I'm new to this forum, I hope I won't be irr

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

01-03-2026 08:55

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour , Je souhaiterais recevoir cet article :Â

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

28-02-2026 14:43

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

A new refrence desired :Svanidze, T.V. (1984) Novy

27-02-2026 17:51

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Quelqu'un peut il me donner un conseil p

28-02-2026 15:52

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

Who has an idea ? I have no coupes made for conid

29-11-2024 21:47

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'avais un deuxième échantillon moins mat

27-02-2026 16:17

Mathias Hass Mathias Hass

Hi, Found this on Betula, rather fresh fallen twi

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk