![](/images/nonlu.png)
17-12-2024 12:33
![Lothar Krieglsteiner](/uploads/user_vgn/Krieglsteiner-0001.jpg)
this fluffy anamorph was repeatedly found on decid
![](/images/nonlu.png)
23-12-2024 12:10
![Bernard CLESSE](/uploads/user_vgn/CLESSE-0001.jpg)
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-12-2024 12:45
![Marc Detollenaere](/uploads/user_vgn/Detollenaere-0001.jpg)
Dear Forum,On naked wood of Fagus, I found some ha
![](/images/nonlu.png)
22-12-2024 10:19
Hello,can anyone help me identify this small ascom
![](/images/nonlu.png)
22-12-2024 10:53
![Bernard CLESSE](/uploads/user_vgn/CLESSE-0001.jpg)
Pourriez-vous me confirmer ma détermination de ce
![](/images/nonlu.png)
20-12-2024 17:32
Louis DENYBonsoir forumTrouvé à Belfort, 400 m altitude, s
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk