![](/images/nonlu.png)
24-07-2024 13:19
Thomas FlammerI am looking for a PDF of the above article. Thank
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:13
![Thierry Blondelle](/uploads/user_vgn/-0211.jpg)
Bonjour,Récolte sur branchette de Castanea dans u
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:28
![Alan Rockefeller](/uploads/user_vgn/-0063.jpg)
Which Peziza did I find on horse dung in Humboldt
![](/images/nonlu.png)
19-07-2024 11:08
![Miguel Ãngel Ribes](/uploads/user_vgn/Ribes-0001.jpg)
Good morningThis Scutellinia from July 9 grew at 1
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 06:23
Masanori KutsunaDear all, Does anyone have these papers and send
![](/images/nonlu.png)
08-07-2024 23:34
Villalonga PacoSmall Scutellinia growing in garden soil (calcareo
![Marc Detollenaere](/uploads/user_vgn/Detollenaere-0001.jpg)
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?
Marc
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,
François
dd. 4/10/2020
(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7
dd. 22/112022
(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8
dd. 29/11/2022
15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9
![Nicolas VAN VOOREN](/uploads/user_vgn/VAN-VOOREN-0001.jpg)
![Marc Detollenaere](/uploads/user_vgn/Detollenaere-0001.jpg)
Thank you very much for your comments
Marc